Simplify support of 32-bit architectures #22
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Great idea! There a little issue in the CI. |
|
@ulysses4ever fixed now. |
ulysses4ever
approved these changes
Mar 11, 2024
|
@ulysses4ever @swamp-agr any more comments / suggestions on this? |
|
Thank you! |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
vector-hashtables/vector-hashtables.cabal
Lines 30 to 33 in 11a161f
isn't really sufficient: there are more 32-bit architectures such as ARM and such.
But also it seems we can simplify the setup without losing anything, no?