Curate v2 - Dispute Template Mappings

[jaybuidl]

For registration and removal

[kemuru]

DRAFTS: LATEST CURATE V2 data mappings as of JUNE 21th 2024:

(Note: this will not work unless we merge this PR first)

externalDisputeID:

68152692838298474339874139169477393633602191216392212953473825982977611143873

TEMPLATE DATA (it should be dynamic at dispute creation?), as an example to try on the DisputeTemplateView of our court v2:

{
  "$schema": "../NewDisputeTemplate.schema.json",
  "title": "Add a {{itemName}} to {{registryTitle}}",
  "description": "Someone requested to add an {{itemName}} to {{registryTitle}}",
  "question": "Does the {{itemName}} comply with the required criteria?",
  "answers": [
    {
      "title": "Yes, Add It",
      "description": "Select this if you think the {{itemName}} complies with the required criteria and should be added."
    },
    {
      "title": "No, Don't Add It",
      "description": "Select this if you think the {{itemName}} does not comply with the required criteria and should not be added."
    }
  ],
  "policyURI": "{{{policyURI}}}",
  "frontendUrl": "https://master--curate-v2.netlify.app/#/lists/item/{{itemID}}",
  "arbitrableChainID": "421614",
  "arbitrableAddress": "{{arbitrableAddress}}",
  "arbitratorChainID": "421614",
  "arbitratorAddress": "0x??",
  "metadata": {
    "itemName": "{{itemName}}",
    "itemDescription": "{{itemDescription}}",
    "registryTitle": "{{registryTitle}}",
    "registryDescription": "{{registryDescription}}"
  },
  "category": "Curated Lists",
  "version": "1.0"
}

DATA MAPPINGS:

[
  {
    "type": "graphql",
    "endpoint": "https://api.studio.thegraph.com/query/61738/curate-v2-devnet/version/latest",
    "query": "query SearchRequestByDisputeID($externalDisputeID: BigInt!) { requests(where: { externalDisputeID: $externalDisputeID }) { id disputeID submissionTime resolved requester { id } challenger { id } arbitrator arbitratorExtraData deposit disputeOutcome requestType item { id itemID data status registry { id title description policyURI } } } }",
    "variables": {
      "externalDisputeID": "{{externalDisputeID}}"
    },
    "seek": [
      "requests[0].item.registry.title",
      "requests[0].item.registry.description",
      "requests[0].item.registry.policyURI",
      "requests[0].item.id",
      "requests[0].item.data",
      "requests[0].item.status",
      "requests[0].item.registry.id"
    ],
    "populate": [
      "registryTitle",
      "registryDescription",
      "policyURI",
      "itemID",
      "itemData",
      "itemStatus",
      "listAddress"
    ]
  },
  {
    "type": "json",
    "value": "{{{itemData}}}",
    "seek": [
      "columns[0].label",
      "columns[0].description"
    ],
    "populate": [
      "itemName",
      "itemDescription"
    ]
  }
]

[Harman-singh-waraich]

looks good,

There's one issue.
itemID !== item.id

item.id is ${itemID}@${registryAddress}
where itemID is the id of the item in contract

---

To be fixed in line 13

---

else we can just swap the frontend url :

  "frontendUrl": "https://curate-v2.kleros.builders/#/lists/item/{{itemID}}@{{listAddress}}",

with :

  "frontendUrl": "https://curate-v2.kleros.builders/#/lists/item/{{itemID}}", 

here itemID = itemIDFromContract@RegistryAddress , which is pretty confusing. I prefer the first one

[jaybuidl]

Removal Dispute Template: same data mappings

[jaybuidl]

Updated here: https://github.com/kleros/curate-v2/pull/44/files#diff-cd2a2e59ec1eb15addd6c5c8a2a13dac5635c1003ac037dace082f99f4457657