Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[release-1.13] Use error log level when contract parsing fails #3744

Conversation

knative-prow-robot
Copy link
Contributor

This is an automated cherry-pick of #3738

@knative-prow knative-prow bot added area/data-plane size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Mar 7, 2024
@knative-prow knative-prow bot requested review from aliok and Leo6Leo March 7, 2024 20:46
Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 7, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 52.47%. Comparing base (0da6205) to head (8f03255).

Additional details and impacted files
@@                Coverage Diff                 @@
##             release-1.13    #3744      +/-   ##
==================================================
+ Coverage           48.46%   52.47%   +4.01%     
- Complexity              0      846     +846     
==================================================
  Files                 241      338      +97     
  Lines               17535    20742    +3207     
  Branches                0      273     +273     
==================================================
+ Hits                 8498    10884    +2386     
- Misses               8326     8980     +654     
- Partials              711      878     +167     
Flag Coverage Δ
java-unittests 74.49% <100.00%> (?)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Contributor

@matzew matzew left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm
/approve

/retest

@knative-prow knative-prow bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Mar 8, 2024
Copy link

knative-prow bot commented Mar 8, 2024

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: knative-prow-robot, matzew

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@knative-prow knative-prow bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Mar 8, 2024
@matzew
Copy link
Contributor

matzew commented Mar 8, 2024

/retest

@creydr
Copy link
Contributor

creydr commented Mar 8, 2024

/test reconciler-tests-namespaced-broker

@knative-prow knative-prow bot merged commit ca09ace into knative-extensions:release-1.13 Mar 8, 2024
33 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. area/data-plane lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants