Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[release-1.13] Don't drop traffic when upgrading a deployment fails #14864

Conversation

knative-prow-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@knative-prow-robot knative-prow-robot commented Feb 2, 2024

This is an automated cherry-pick of #14840

Part of #14795

Depends on 1.12 point release with the following fix - #14840

When transforming the deployment status to the revision
we want to bubble up the more severe condition to Ready.

Since Replica failures will include a more actionable error
message this condition is preferred
This isn't accurate when the Revision has failed to rollout
an update to it's deployment
1. PA Reachability now depends on the status of the Deployment

If we have available replicas we don't mark the revision as
unreachable. This allows ongoing requests to be handled

2. Always propagate the K8s Deployment Status to the Revision.

We don't need to gate this depending on whether the Revision
required activation. Since the only two conditions we propagate
from the Deployment is Progressing and ReplicaSetFailure=False

3. Mark Revision as Deploying if the PA's service name isn't set
@knative-prow knative-prow bot added the area/API API objects and controllers label Feb 2, 2024
@knative-prow knative-prow bot added area/autoscale area/test-and-release It flags unit/e2e/conformance/perf test issues for product features size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Feb 2, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 2, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: 3 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Comparison is base (1c46c07) 85.91% compared to head (b0e8176) 85.90%.

Files Patch % Lines
pkg/apis/serving/v1/revision_lifecycle.go 70.00% 2 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@               Coverage Diff                @@
##           release-1.13   #14864      +/-   ##
================================================
- Coverage         85.91%   85.90%   -0.02%     
================================================
  Files               197      197              
  Lines             14991    15000       +9     
================================================
+ Hits              12879    12885       +6     
- Misses             1798     1800       +2     
- Partials            314      315       +1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@dprotaso
Copy link
Member

dprotaso commented Feb 3, 2024

/retest

@dprotaso
Copy link
Member

dprotaso commented Feb 3, 2024

/lgtm
/approve

@knative-prow knative-prow bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Feb 3, 2024
Copy link

knative-prow bot commented Feb 3, 2024

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: dprotaso, knative-prow-robot

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@knative-prow knative-prow bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Feb 3, 2024
@knative-prow knative-prow bot merged commit 41769de into knative:release-1.13 Feb 3, 2024
49 checks passed
openshift-merge-bot bot pushed a commit to openshift-knative/serving that referenced this pull request Mar 11, 2024
…native#14864) (#655)

* Surface Replica failures over Progressing failures

When transforming the deployment status to the revision
we want to bubble up the more severe condition to Ready.

Since Replica failures will include a more actionable error
message this condition is preferred

* Stop always marking the revision healthy when the PA is Ready

This isn't accurate when the Revision has failed to rollout
an update to it's deployment

* Various updates to the revision reconciler

1. PA Reachability now depends on the status of the Deployment

If we have available replicas we don't mark the revision as
unreachable. This allows ongoing requests to be handled

2. Always propagate the K8s Deployment Status to the Revision.

We don't need to gate this depending on whether the Revision
required activation. Since the only two conditions we propagate
from the Deployment is Progressing and ReplicaSetFailure=False

3. Mark Revision as Deploying if the PA's service name isn't set

* test deployment failures don't drop traffic on upgrade

* fix boilerplate check

---------

Co-authored-by: Knative Prow Robot <automation+prow-robot@knative.team>
Co-authored-by: dprotaso <dprotaso@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: John Doe <johndoe@localhost>
ReToCode pushed a commit to ReToCode/serving that referenced this pull request Mar 27, 2024
…native#14864) (knative#655)

* Surface Replica failures over Progressing failures

When transforming the deployment status to the revision
we want to bubble up the more severe condition to Ready.

Since Replica failures will include a more actionable error
message this condition is preferred

* Stop always marking the revision healthy when the PA is Ready

This isn't accurate when the Revision has failed to rollout
an update to it's deployment

* Various updates to the revision reconciler

1. PA Reachability now depends on the status of the Deployment

If we have available replicas we don't mark the revision as
unreachable. This allows ongoing requests to be handled

2. Always propagate the K8s Deployment Status to the Revision.

We don't need to gate this depending on whether the Revision
required activation. Since the only two conditions we propagate
from the Deployment is Progressing and ReplicaSetFailure=False

3. Mark Revision as Deploying if the PA's service name isn't set

* test deployment failures don't drop traffic on upgrade

* fix boilerplate check

---------

Co-authored-by: Knative Prow Robot <automation+prow-robot@knative.team>
Co-authored-by: dprotaso <dprotaso@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: John Doe <johndoe@localhost>
openshift-merge-bot bot pushed a commit to openshift-knative/serving that referenced this pull request Mar 27, 2024
…native#14864) (#655) (#675)

* Surface Replica failures over Progressing failures

When transforming the deployment status to the revision
we want to bubble up the more severe condition to Ready.

Since Replica failures will include a more actionable error
message this condition is preferred

* Stop always marking the revision healthy when the PA is Ready

This isn't accurate when the Revision has failed to rollout
an update to it's deployment

* Various updates to the revision reconciler

1. PA Reachability now depends on the status of the Deployment

If we have available replicas we don't mark the revision as
unreachable. This allows ongoing requests to be handled

2. Always propagate the K8s Deployment Status to the Revision.

We don't need to gate this depending on whether the Revision
required activation. Since the only two conditions we propagate
from the Deployment is Progressing and ReplicaSetFailure=False

3. Mark Revision as Deploying if the PA's service name isn't set

* test deployment failures don't drop traffic on upgrade

* fix boilerplate check

---------

Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Knative Prow Robot <automation+prow-robot@knative.team>
Co-authored-by: dprotaso <dprotaso@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: John Doe <johndoe@localhost>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. area/API API objects and controllers area/autoscale area/test-and-release It flags unit/e2e/conformance/perf test issues for product features lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants