Adding Support for UUID Type

[Jiraiya43]

This pull request introduces support for UUID (Universally Unique Identifier) types within your application.

[shalvah]

I'm not sold on this. We try to restrict ourselves to the most common primitive data types, not subtypes. If we add a uuid type, what's stopping us from adding an ip type, or an email type?

[Jiraiya43]

In fact, when I submitted the PR, I had the same thought. However, I thought that rather than restrict the options, we could use Faker as a generator and stick to the types it offers. What particularly frustrated me was that when I renamed the field to "uuid", it generated an example UUID, but when I set the type to "uuid", an example"string" type was provided instead.

[shalvah]

That's an interesting proposal. Will need to consider it some more.

[shalvah]

In fact, when I submitted the PR, I had the same thought. However, I thought that rather than restrict the options, we could use Faker as a generator and stick to the types it offers. What particularly frustrated me was that when I renamed the field to "uuid", it generated an example UUID, but when I set the type to "uuid", an example"string" type was provided instead.

I know it's been a while, but this is a good idea, and I could get behind it if you want to implement it. Esssentially:

• you can use any type provided by Faker
• Scribe will use that as a hint to generate the correct example

Closing this PR and making an issue from that.