Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Implemented GetRecordingEdl #65

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from
Closed

Implemented GetRecordingEdl #65

wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

krustyreturns
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@krustyreturns
Copy link
Contributor Author

@krustyreturns
Copy link
Contributor Author

Wondering why nothing is happening. Did I do something wrong on the PR? Or is it just too late to get it into kodi18?

Copy link

@sbthomas44 sbthomas44 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me. Tested and verified to resolve no commercial skip in Kodi 18 for ServerWMC PVR.

Copy link
Member

@ksooo ksooo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please squash down the changes to a single commit. Then we should be ready to go.

<addon
id="pvr.wmc"
version="2.4.3"
version="2.4.5"
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why is the version number increased by 2?Should read 2.4.4 imo.

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

2.4.4 was used as the version to test. I'm guessing to be safe it was incremented again to ensure any machines with the dev/test version of the add-on get the final version included with Kodi.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hmm, fairly uncommon as now everybody is wondering what happend to 2.4.4.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'd like to keep the version to 2.4.5. Basically the for the reason sbthomas said, but there are also comment changes between the tested version and this one.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Also... I don't know how to 'squash down the changes to a single commit'. If that's required I would need to do some research, or a little guidance.

@@ -1,4 +1,7 @@
2.4.0
2.4.5
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

2.4.4

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I didn't think 2.4.4 needed to be there since it was the same as 2.4.5 and very few people used 2.4.4.

@@ -21,5 +21,5 @@

inline std::string PVRWMC_GetClientVersion()
{
return "2.4.0"; // ALSO CHANGE IN REV NUMBER in 'pvr.wmc/addon.xml.in'
return "2.4.5"; // ALSO CHANGE IN REV NUMBER in 'pvr.wmc/addon.xml.in'
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

2.4.4

@ksooo
Copy link
Member

ksooo commented Jan 24, 2019

???

@krustyreturns
Copy link
Contributor Author

I gave up. Will try to clean up with a new PR

@ksooo
Copy link
Member

ksooo commented Jan 24, 2019

Okay. 2.4.4, please.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants