New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Implemented GetRecordingEdl #65
Implemented GetRecordingEdl #65
Conversation
resync with upstream
sync with upstream
background: https://forum.kodi.tv/showthread.php?tid=338806 |
Wondering why nothing is happening. Did I do something wrong on the PR? Or is it just too late to get it into kodi18? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good to me. Tested and verified to resolve no commercial skip in Kodi 18 for ServerWMC PVR.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Please squash down the changes to a single commit. Then we should be ready to go.
<addon | ||
id="pvr.wmc" | ||
version="2.4.3" | ||
version="2.4.5" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why is the version number increased by 2?Should read 2.4.4 imo.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
2.4.4 was used as the version to test. I'm guessing to be safe it was incremented again to ensure any machines with the dev/test version of the add-on get the final version included with Kodi.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hmm, fairly uncommon as now everybody is wondering what happend to 2.4.4.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'd like to keep the version to 2.4.5. Basically the for the reason sbthomas said, but there are also comment changes between the tested version and this one.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Also... I don't know how to 'squash down the changes to a single commit'. If that's required I would need to do some research, or a little guidance.
@@ -1,4 +1,7 @@ | |||
2.4.0 | |||
2.4.5 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
2.4.4
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I didn't think 2.4.4 needed to be there since it was the same as 2.4.5 and very few people used 2.4.4.
@@ -21,5 +21,5 @@ | |||
|
|||
inline std::string PVRWMC_GetClientVersion() | |||
{ | |||
return "2.4.0"; // ALSO CHANGE IN REV NUMBER in 'pvr.wmc/addon.xml.in' | |||
return "2.4.5"; // ALSO CHANGE IN REV NUMBER in 'pvr.wmc/addon.xml.in' |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
2.4.4
??? |
I gave up. Will try to clean up with a new PR |
Okay. 2.4.4, please. |
No description provided.