SYCL: Use in-order queues in InterOp tests

[masterleinad]

Follow-up to #6189. Since we might be relying on sycl::queues to be in-order now, we should also use in-order queues in the interoperability tests to be on the safe side.

[crtrott]

Retest this please.

[dalg24]

Should that not be a precondition on SYCL constructor that accept a queue?
By that it means, why aren't we checking that the user-provided queue has the "in order" property?

[masterleinad]

By that it means, why aren't we checking that the user-provided queue has the "in order" property?

Good idea. 55a5899

[crtrott]

We could make the things which are protected by in-order macro protected by a runtime check instead. Thus it would work either way for interop purposes. We could also wait with that until someone asks and until then we unconditionally check.

[dalg24]

SYCL tests do not pass (precondition is in-order queue violations)

[masterleinad]

SYCL tests do not pass (precondition is in-order queue violations)

Sorry about that. Fixed!

[masterleinad]

For the OpenMPTarget CI build we have

 1 - Kokkos_CoreUnitTest_Serial1 (Timeout)
 4 - Kokkos_CoreUnitTest_OpenMPTarget (Timeout)
18 - Kokkos_CoreUnitTest_StackTraceTest (Timeout)

which looks unrelated.

[dalg24]

Please make sure you mention the enforcing the precondition in the changelog