More test clean up of residue in data/

[jaadams5]

Added an option not to write the adventure queue and turns files and then disabled the write in tests that created them but were not cleaning them up.

Changed the username for several tests to make it easier to find which test was leaving files based on the username behind.

Lint and spotless.

Since the tests that got changed were not using the Cleanups framework I elected not to change them to do so. baby steps.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #1261 (a6c4770) into main (dbcf1ff) will increase coverage by 0.00%.
The diff coverage is 81.25%.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##               main    #1261   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage     32.51%   32.51%           
- Complexity    16072    16073    +1     
=========================================
  Files          1042     1042           
  Lines        162365   162352   -13     
  Branches      35257    35257           
=========================================
  Hits          52790    52790           
+ Misses       100289   100276   -13     
  Partials       9286     9286           

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
...e/kolmafia/persistence/AdventureSpentDatabase.java	34.73% <60.00%> (-5.67%)	⬇️
...e/kolmafia/persistence/AdventureQueueDatabase.java	35.61% <90.90%> (+2.71%)	⬆️
src/net/sourceforge/kolmafia/RequestThread.java	38.18% <0.00%> (+1.21%)	⬆️
...sourceforge/kolmafia/textui/langserver/Script.java	85.10% <0.00%> (+4.25%)	⬆️

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update dbcf1ff...a6c4770. Read the comment docs.

[midgleyc]

Many comments.

Additionally, on the tests: we may want to set it to false in ClearSharedStateBefore, same as we do for sessionId, because while the tests are running we never want it true.

[jaadams5]

I think I addressed all of @midgleyc 's comments. That said, I think the AfterEach to AfterAll was not the right move. I need to run the tests locally which has gotten harder since something has doubled the wall clock time to do so...

[jaadams5]

Local test worked. Thanks.