koord-manager: revise node resource framework

[saintube]

Ⅰ. Describe what this PR does

Revise node resource framework:

1. Add a sequence of the plugins' execution by the registered order.
2. Make the degraded resource calculation private in each ResourceCalculatePlugin.
3. Use structural logs in the node-resource controller.

Ⅱ. Does this pull request fix one issue?

fixes #1060

Ⅲ. Describe how to verify it

Ⅳ. Special notes for reviews

V. Checklist

• I have written necessary docs and comments
• I have added necessary unit tests and integration tests
• All checks passed in make test

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Patch coverage: 71.20% and no project coverage change.

Comparison is base (b3bb7de) 66.65% compared to head (6c2e0e2) 66.66%.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #1101   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   66.65%   66.66%           
=======================================
  Files         266      268    +2     
  Lines       29210    29257   +47     
=======================================
+ Hits        19470    19503   +33     
- Misses       8355     8364    +9     
- Partials     1385     1390    +5     

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	66.66% <71.20%> (+<0.01%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
...-controller/noderesource/framework/noderesource.go	12.96% <0.00%> (+0.46%)	⬆️
...controller/noderesource/noderesource_controller.go	39.39% <54.54%> (-1.15%)	⬇️
...ntroller/noderesource/framework/extender_plugin.go	44.77% <56.41%> (-2.69%)	⬇️
...oller/noderesource/plugins/batchresource/plugin.go	68.57% <60.00%> (-1.43%)	⬇️
...slo-controller/noderesource/resource_calculator.go	81.81% <71.42%> (-3.19%)	⬇️
.../slo-controller/noderesource/framework/registry.go	92.68% <92.68%> (ø)
...ontroller/noderesource/nodemetric_event_handler.go	90.90% <100.00%> (ø)
pkg/slo-controller/noderesource/plugins_profile.go	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

... and 2 files with indirect coverage changes

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

[hormes]

Setting the priority on the plugin will make understanding very complicated, because the logic is scattered in different files, it is difficult to add a plugin to know where it should be placed. If there is a strong order dependency between plugins, then we should have a place to register each plugin uniformly and arrange their order here.

[hormes]

I see that priority has been removed, and some comments and functions have not been removed

[saintube]

I see that priority has been removed, and some comments and functions have not been removed

Fixed.

[jasonliu747]

/lgtm
others PTAL @hormes @zwzhang0107

[zwzhang0107]

/lgtm
/hold until local branch is ready

[zwzhang0107]

/hold cancel
/approve

[koordinator-bot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: zwzhang0107

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• pkg/slo-controller/OWNERS [zwzhang0107]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[zwzhang0107]

/lgtm