proposal: update Enhanced Scheduler Extension

[eahydra]

Signed-off-by: Joseph joseph.t.lee@outlook.com

Ⅰ. Describe what this PR does

Update overview image and add comment to Hook

Ⅱ. Does this pull request fix one issue?

Ⅲ. Describe how to verify it

Ⅳ. Special notes for reviews

V. Checklist

• I have written necessary docs and comments
• I have added necessary unit tests and integration tests
• All checks passed in make test

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Base: 67.91% // Head: 67.90% // Decreases project coverage by -0.00% ⚠️

Coverage data is based on head (e5778a0) compared to base (39cb1d1).
Patch has no changes to coverable lines.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #798      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   67.91%   67.90%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         216      216              
  Lines       24368    24368              
==========================================
- Hits        16549    16548       -1     
  Misses       6675     6675              
- Partials     1144     1145       +1     

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	67.90% <ø> (-0.01%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
pkg/koordlet/runtimehooks/reconciler/reconciler.go	78.94% <0.00%> (-2.11%)	⬇️
...eduler/plugins/coscheduling/controller/podgroup.go	72.19% <0.00%> (-1.96%)	⬇️
pkg/util/httputil/reverseproxy.go	85.37% <0.00%> (+0.53%)	⬆️
pkg/koordlet/statesinformer/states_pods.go	56.73% <0.00%> (+2.12%)	⬆️

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report at Codecov.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

[hormes]

As we discussed, it actually belongs to a transformation inside the scheduling process, adjusted in place in one step?

[eahydra]

As we discussed, it actually belongs to a transformation inside the scheduling process, adjusted in place in one step?

updated

[hormes]

/lgtm
/approve

[koordinator-bot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: hormes

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS [hormes]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[FillZpp]

/milestone v1.1