Use zopfli
instead of flate2
for Gzip compression
#112
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
As mentioned in #100,
cargo-deb
used to use the Zopfli crate for compressing data using the Gzip format, which provides overall smaller results than other general-purpose Gzip encoders that cater to speed more. I think this is a good tradeoff for data meant to be compressed once and distributed or decompressed many times, such as Debian packages.However, the
zopfli
crate API did not support the streaming Gzip encoding thatcargo-deb
moved to. This has changed with its latest v0.8.0 release, bringing it more on par withflate2
, so that's no longer a reason to not use Zopfli.I ran the available test suite and noticed no regressions due to this change.