Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Ignore unknown keys in request JSON #127

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Apr 18, 2021
Merged

Ignore unknown keys in request JSON #127

merged 3 commits into from
Apr 18, 2021

Conversation

koxudaxi
Copy link
Owner

Related Issues

#124

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 18, 2021

Codecov Report

❗ No coverage uploaded for pull request base (master@a8fbbb0). Click here to learn what that means.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             master      #127   +/-   ##
==========================================
  Coverage          ?   100.00%           
  Complexity        ?        36           
==========================================
  Files             ?         8           
  Lines             ?       286           
  Branches          ?        43           
==========================================
  Hits              ?       286           
  Misses            ?         0           
  Partials          ?         0           
Flag Coverage Δ Complexity Δ
unittests 100.00% <ø> (?) 36.00 <ø> (?)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.


Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update a8fbbb0...3a4b693. Read the comment docs.

@koxudaxi koxudaxi merged commit d69a667 into master Apr 18, 2021
@koxudaxi koxudaxi deleted the ignore_unknnown_keys branch April 18, 2021 16:43
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

1 participant