-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 39
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Inconsistency of project license (LGPL? GPL?) #88
Comments
Thanks for finding this and letting me know. Indeed it should be LGPL her, changed the What are you packaging? If ksnip, there we seem to have the same issue but the other way, there all the headers need to be changed to |
Thanks, I was just starting from packaging the dependency libraries; knsip itself will be packaged later. It would be great if all known issues either in kimageannotator or ksnip could be fixed soon. |
If you mean the license stuff with „all know issues“, then yes, probably tomorrow during the day (Germany time). I‘ll check also kcolorpicker, which probably has the same issue as kimageannotator.
…________________________________
From: Boyuan Yang <notifications@github.com>
Sent: Saturday, April 18, 2020 11:18:50 PM
To: ksnip/kImageAnnotator <kImageAnnotator@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Damir Porobic <damir_porobic@live.com>; Assign <assign@noreply.github.com>
Subject: Re: [ksnip/kImageAnnotator] Inconsistency of project license (LGPL? GPL?) (#88)
Thanks, I was just starting from packaging the dependency libraries; knsip itself will be packaged later. It would be great if all known issues either in kimageannotator or ksnip could be fixed soon.
—
You are receiving this because you were assigned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<#88 (comment)>, or unsubscribe<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ADBUCTAS42OGL4543T3RFZTRNIKLVANCNFSM4MLP7HOA>.
|
Done, should all be correct now. kImageAnnotator LGPL3 and ksnip GPL2. Let me know if I can be of any further assistance. |
Thanks! |
While packaging ksnip and all dependencies in Debian, the license review discovers that there are inconsistencies in project and file licensing for kImageAnnotator.
All files contain a header stating that the file is licensed under GNU Lesser General Public License version 2 or later (
LGPL-2.0+
). However, theLICENSE
file at that top directory of the project contains a copy of GNU General Public License (GPL-2
). They are completely different licenses with different considerations.Could you please update the license file to correctly reflect the actual license of this project? I believe the whole project should be licensed under
LGPL-2.0+
but I'm not sure if that is intended.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: