-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 702
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Bump remark-gfm from 1.0.0 to 2.0.0 in /dashboard #3248
Bump remark-gfm from 1.0.0 to 2.0.0 in /dashboard #3248
Conversation
@dependabot recreate |
d4bcc9e
to
6c67167
Compare
Bumps [remark-gfm](https://github.com/remarkjs/remark-gfm) from 1.0.0 to 2.0.0. - [Release notes](https://github.com/remarkjs/remark-gfm/releases) - [Commits](remarkjs/remark-gfm@1.0.0...2.0.0) --- updated-dependencies: - dependency-name: remark-gfm dependency-type: direct:production update-type: version-update:semver-major ... Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com>
6c67167
to
3915e3e
Compare
Signed-off-by: Antonio Gamez Diaz <agamez@vmware.com>
@@ -147,7 +147,7 @@ | |||
"!src/**/*.d.ts" | |||
], | |||
"transformIgnorePatterns": [ | |||
"node_modules/(?!@clr|@cds|lit|@lit|ramda|lodash-es|.*css)" | |||
"node_modules/(?!@cds|@clr|@lit|bail|ccount|character-entities|comma-separated-tokens|escape-string-regexp|is-plain-obj|lit|lodash-es|markdown-table|mdast-util-definitions|mdast-util-find-and-replace|mdast-util-from-markdown|mdast-util-gfm|mdast-util-gfm-autolink-literal|mdast-util-to-hast|mdast-util-to-markdown|mdast-util-to-string|micromark|micromark-core-commonmark|parse-entities|property-information|ramda|react-markdown|remark-gfm|remark-parse|remark-rehype|space-separated-tokens|trough|unified|unist-builder|unist-util-generated|unist-util-is|unist-util-position|unist-util-stringify-position|unist-util-visit|unist-util-visit-parents|util-find-and-replace|vfile|vfile-message|.*css)" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
For some deps we can come up with some regex catching unist-*
and mdast-*
, but I don't know if we better declare them explicitly to avoid unnoticed issues.
However, it is just for running jest
tests, so we will know really quickly if something fails.
cc @absoludity
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sorry, I missed the cc earlier. Yeah, given this is just jest config, I'm not too worried. I'm surprised that updating remark-gfm lead to this though (many of the packages just seem to be upgraded... did the previous versions not require transformation?).
Anyway, +1 from me - I generally prefer explicit, but for a huge regex like this for a test module... don't care :)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No problem, the ping was mainly for squeezing this PR in the 2.3.4 release, but it's not critical whatsoever.
As many deps are migrating to ES Modules, the jest tests fail. This is an open issue in jest, but they do have some workarounds (see https://jestjs.io/docs/ecmascript-modules).
The currently chosen tweak is the easiest one, declaring each module in transformIgnorePatterns
, but it is tedious if a module has many transitive ESM deps (as in this case).
I've seen another dependabot upgrade is also similar, so we need to handle this problem in a more scalable way at some point.
So, what I would suggest is to go ahead with this PR (and perhaps the existing ones), but create a task for looking for a long-term solution.
@@ -147,7 +147,7 @@ | |||
"!src/**/*.d.ts" | |||
], | |||
"transformIgnorePatterns": [ | |||
"node_modules/(?!@clr|@cds|lit|@lit|ramda|lodash-es|.*css)" | |||
"node_modules/(?!@cds|@clr|@lit|bail|ccount|character-entities|comma-separated-tokens|escape-string-regexp|is-plain-obj|lit|lodash-es|markdown-table|mdast-util-definitions|mdast-util-find-and-replace|mdast-util-from-markdown|mdast-util-gfm|mdast-util-gfm-autolink-literal|mdast-util-to-hast|mdast-util-to-markdown|mdast-util-to-string|micromark|micromark-core-commonmark|parse-entities|property-information|ramda|react-markdown|remark-gfm|remark-parse|remark-rehype|space-separated-tokens|trough|unified|unist-builder|unist-util-generated|unist-util-is|unist-util-position|unist-util-stringify-position|unist-util-visit|unist-util-visit-parents|util-find-and-replace|vfile|vfile-message|.*css)" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sorry, I missed the cc earlier. Yeah, given this is just jest config, I'm not too worried. I'm surprised that updating remark-gfm lead to this though (many of the packages just seem to be upgraded... did the previous versions not require transformation?).
Anyway, +1 from me - I generally prefer explicit, but for a huge regex like this for a test module... don't care :)
Signed-off-by: Antonio Gamez Diaz <agamez@vmware.com> Conflicts: dashboard/yarn.lock
Bumps remark-gfm from 1.0.0 to 2.0.0.
Release notes
Sourced from remark-gfm's releases.
Commits
383f418
2.0.054b2ada
Updatexo
37d92ac
Add JSDoc based types0846014
Remove warning for remark 121785879
Update docs9bc5759
Refactor code-style331d940
Update dependencies6c518d8
Use ESM93b0afb
Replacenyc
withc8
902b287
Update Node in ActionsDependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting
@dependabot rebase
.Dependabot commands and options
You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:
@dependabot rebase
will rebase this PR@dependabot recreate
will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it@dependabot merge
will merge this PR after your CI passes on it@dependabot squash and merge
will squash and merge this PR after your CI passes on it@dependabot cancel merge
will cancel a previously requested merge and block automerging@dependabot reopen
will reopen this PR if it is closed@dependabot close
will close this PR and stop Dependabot recreating it. You can achieve the same result by closing it manually@dependabot ignore this major version
will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)@dependabot ignore this minor version
will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)@dependabot ignore this dependency
will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)