Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

remove server block and associated values #1330

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Mar 28, 2022

Conversation

AjayTripathy
Copy link
Contributor

@AjayTripathy AjayTripathy commented Mar 27, 2022

What does this PR change?

Remove cost-analyzer-server which has been deprecated for several releases!

Also repairs the default grafana install.

Does this PR rely on any other PRs?

A number of PRs deprecating cost-analyzer-server.

How does this PR impact users? (This is the kind of thing that goes in release notes!)

Fewer containers to run, save memory

Links to Issues or ZD tickets this PR addresses or fixes

How was this PR tested?

atripathy@Ajays-MacBook-Pro builds % kubectl get pods -n kubecost
NAME READY STATUS RESTARTS AGE
kubecost-cost-analyzer-578f956bcd-pwcng 2/2 Running 0 18m

Plus integration testing to make sure all endpoints referencing this have been removed.

For grafana:
After restarting the grafana pod:
Screen Shot 2022-03-28 at 1 25 49 PM

Have you made an update to documentation?

There are many references to cost-analyzer-server that should be removed scattered throughout the docs. Let's make a note and remove these as we find them.

Copy link
Contributor

@mbolt35 mbolt35 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

All of this looks good

@@ -653,6 +637,15 @@ initChownData:
grafana:
# namespace_datasources: kubecost # override the default namespace here
# namespace_dashboards: kubecost # override the default namespace here
datasources:
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What's going on here?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Oh nevermind, didn't realize you doubled up PRs :)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants