Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

SDK/Compiler - Invoke the op_transformers as early as possible #1464

Merged
merged 3 commits into from Jun 7, 2019
Merged

SDK/Compiler - Invoke the op_transformers as early as possible #1464

merged 3 commits into from Jun 7, 2019

Conversation

kvalev
Copy link
Contributor

@kvalev kvalev commented Jun 6, 2019

Invoking the op_transformers functions after the container inputs have been determined will result in an invalid argo yaml definition, in case a transformation function is used to set pod labels based on a pipeline parameter.

Before this PR:

  - dag:
      tasks:
      - name: cop
        template: cop
    name: parameters-in-op-transformation-functions

After this PR:

  - dag:
      tasks:
      - arguments:
          parameters:
          - name: param
            value: '{{inputs.parameters.param}}'
        name: cop
        template: cop
    inputs:
      parameters:
      - name: param
    name: parameters-in-op-transformation-functions

This change is Reviewable

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @kvalev. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubeflow member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@kvalev
Copy link
Contributor Author

kvalev commented Jun 6, 2019

/assign @hongye-sun

@Ark-kun
Copy link
Contributor

Ark-kun commented Jun 6, 2019

/lgtm

@hongye-sun
Copy link
Contributor

I don't have any problem with this PR. Alexey, do you have any comment?

@Ark-kun
Copy link
Contributor

Ark-kun commented Jun 7, 2019

I don't have any problem with this PR. Alexey, do you have any comment?

I think it's good. There might be cases where the old behavior is desirable, but the proposed variant seems to be more useful overall: It's now on par with calling .apply in the pipeline function (since that's also executed early).

/approve

BTW, Initially I wanted to have two transformers - op_transformer that runs before compilation to template and the template_transformer that runs after. But we've decided to drop the template_transformer

@Ark-kun
Copy link
Contributor

Ark-kun commented Jun 7, 2019

/test kubeflow-pipeline-sample-test

@Ark-kun
Copy link
Contributor

Ark-kun commented Jun 7, 2019

/hold
The tests are failing. I'm looking why the unit tests are not failing.

@Ark-kun
Copy link
Contributor

Ark-kun commented Jun 7, 2019

The code is not compatible with Python 3.5 which we still support (partially due to Debian)
/approve cancel

@Ark-kun
Copy link
Contributor

Ark-kun commented Jun 7, 2019

/lgtm
Waiting for all tests to pass.

@kvalev
Copy link
Contributor Author

kvalev commented Jun 7, 2019

I was not aware that it should be compatible with Python 3.5 - the travis build only tests 3.6. I reverted the type hinting, would you mind taking another look @Ark-kun?

@Ark-kun
Copy link
Contributor

Ark-kun commented Jun 7, 2019

I was not aware that it should be compatible with Python 3.5

In latest stable Debian the latest version of python you can get using apt-get is 3.5.

'Programming Language :: Python :: 3.5',

I'd like to get a data point from you: If the KF Pipelines SDK needed the python version that you cannot install by just running apt-get install python3, would that be a problem for you? Do you think that can be a problem for other potential users?

@Ark-kun
Copy link
Contributor

Ark-kun commented Jun 7, 2019

/hold cancel

@kvalev
Copy link
Contributor Author

kvalev commented Jun 7, 2019

Well, it would not stop me from using the SDK, but it would be somewhat annoying, if I cant just pip install it. Sure, you can always either compile a newer Python version yourself or run it in a docker container, but it is just not the same. I would suggest keeping the Python 3.5 compatibility - I dont think there are significant downsides.

@Ark-kun
Copy link
Contributor

Ark-kun commented Jun 7, 2019

/approve

There seems to be a conflict. Can you please resolve it?

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: Ark-kun

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lgtm label Jun 7, 2019
@Ark-kun
Copy link
Contributor

Ark-kun commented Jun 7, 2019

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 381083a into kubeflow:master Jun 7, 2019
@kvalev kvalev deleted the kvalev/op-transforms-order branch June 8, 2019 07:11
magdalenakuhn17 pushed a commit to magdalenakuhn17/pipelines that referenced this pull request Oct 22, 2023
* Update version to 0.5.1

* Update README.md

Removed section to apply kfserving_crds.yaml
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants