Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

SDK/Components - Don't fail on dict type specs #490

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Dec 8, 2018

Conversation

Ark-kun
Copy link
Contributor

@Ark-kun Ark-kun commented Dec 6, 2018

This change is Reviewable

@Ark-kun Ark-kun changed the title SDK/Components - Allow dict type spec SDK/Components - Don't fail on dict type specs Dec 7, 2018
Copy link
Contributor

@gaoning777 gaoning777 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@Ark-kun
Copy link
Contributor Author

Ark-kun commented Dec 8, 2018

/approve

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: Ark-kun

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

1 similar comment
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: Ark-kun

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit fa1886c into master Dec 8, 2018
neuromage pushed a commit to neuromage/pipelines that referenced this pull request Dec 22, 2018
@Ark-kun Ark-kun deleted the avolkov/SDK/Components---Allow-dict-type-spec branch January 15, 2019 22:08
Linchin pushed a commit to Linchin/pipelines that referenced this pull request Apr 11, 2023
…ame (kubeflow#490)

* We want to support putting junit files in subdirectories e.g.
  junit/junit_workflow1/junit_test1.xml
  junit/junit_workflow2/junit_test1.xml

  * prow_artifacts.py needs to fetch the junit files from GCS in order to
    determine if there were any test failures to properly set the prow job
    status

  * The code however was making an assumption that all results were in
    the artifacts dir and not subdirectories

* run_e2e_workflow.py should set a keyword argument test_target_name
  to the name of the workflow (as set in prow_config.yaml) for each of
  the python functions creating argo workflows.

  * We want to use the junit attribute classname to group tests coming
    from the same workflow. To do that we need to know the name of the workflow.

  * We also use this as a prefix for the test name to support grouping
    hierarchically

* Related to kubeflow/testing#489

* Update kfunittests to Use a junit subdirectory to make sure subdirectories are properly handled.

* Update docs

* update toc.

* Convert test_py_lint to use pytest. Do this because we want to be able to test the use of junit features.

* Add a separate mkdir step.
Linchin pushed a commit to Linchin/pipelines that referenced this pull request Apr 11, 2023
…rid by name (kubeflow#490)" (kubeflow#493)

This reverts commit 16ea186.

The commit breaks kfctl_e2e_workflow.py tests because we introduced an
extra argument.
Linchin pushed a commit to Linchin/pipelines that referenced this pull request Apr 11, 2023
…n test grid by name (kubeflow#490)" (kubeflow#493)" (kubeflow#494)

This reverts commit 81326be.

* Relates to kubeflow#489

* Roll forward the orginal change now that kfctl_create_e2e_workflow.py
  has been updated to handle the extra argument.

add a leading /
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants