Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Samples/Notebooks - Partially restored the lightweight components sample #555

Conversation

Ark-kun
Copy link
Contributor

@Ark-kun Ark-kun commented Dec 17, 2018

Removed the unneeded TF dependency.
Made the metrics and metadata outputs a bit less ugly. (Needs to be properly fixed in future)


This change is Reviewable

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:
To fully approve this pull request, please assign additional approvers.
We suggest the following additional approver: ark-kun

If they are not already assigned, you can assign the PR to them by writing /assign @ark-kun in a comment when ready.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@Ark-kun Ark-kun force-pushed the Notebooks---Partially-restoring-the-Lighweight-components-sample branch from 6b7fdb6 to 06513c9 Compare December 18, 2018 01:28
" from pathlib import Path\n",
"\n",
" #FIX: Metadata and metrics should be output like all other outputs\n",
" ui_metadata_output_path='/mlpipeline-ui-metadata.json'\n",
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

How do you make it work when user run the notebook in jupyter when the path is under root?

@gaoning777
Copy link
Contributor

Are you planning to close this issue? since you did not try to resolve hongye's concern, should we close it?

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@Ark-kun: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Rerun command
kubeflow-pipeline-sample-test 06513c9 link /test kubeflow-pipeline-sample-test
kubeflow-pipeline-upgrade-test 06513c9 link /test kubeflow-pipeline-upgrade-test

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Please help us cut down on flakes by linking to an open issue when you hit one in your PR.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Jun 24, 2020

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

@stale stale bot added the lifecycle/stale The issue / pull request is stale, any activities remove this label. label Jun 24, 2020
@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Jul 1, 2020

This issue has been automatically closed because it has not had recent activity. Please comment "/reopen" to reopen it.

@stale stale bot closed this Jul 1, 2020
Linchin pushed a commit to Linchin/pipelines that referenced this pull request Apr 11, 2023
* update go-license-tool README

* fix typo

* address comments

* fix typos
magdalenakuhn17 pushed a commit to magdalenakuhn17/pipelines that referenced this pull request Oct 22, 2023
HumairAK pushed a commit to red-hat-data-services/data-science-pipelines that referenced this pull request Mar 11, 2024
* Merge KFP changes between 1.5.0-rc.2 and 1.5.0

Resolves kubeflow#554

* Resolve backend and manifest conflicts

* Resolve frontend conflicts
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area/samples/notebooks lifecycle/stale The issue / pull request is stale, any activities remove this label. size/S
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants