Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(sdk)!: move v1 to deprecated folder #7291

Merged
merged 46 commits into from Mar 4, 2022

Conversation

ji-yaqi
Copy link
Contributor

@ji-yaqi ji-yaqi commented Feb 9, 2022

No description provided.

@google-oss-prow
Copy link

Skipping CI for Draft Pull Request.
If you want CI signal for your change, please convert it to an actual PR.
You can still manually trigger a test run with /test all

@ji-yaqi ji-yaqi marked this pull request as ready for review February 10, 2022 02:34
@google-oss-prow google-oss-prow bot added size/XL and removed size/L labels Feb 10, 2022
Copy link
Member

@chensun chensun left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

Feel free to merge by yourself upon fixing the tests.

@@ -245,5 +245,5 @@
}
},
"schemaVersion": "2.1.0",
"sdkVersion": "kfp-1.8.9"
"sdkVersion": "kfp-1.8.11"
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nit: you don't need to update the v2 golden files, they are unrelated to this change. Leaving them alone can give you a smaller diff.

@google-oss-prow google-oss-prow bot removed the lgtm label Feb 13, 2022
@google-oss-prow
Copy link

New changes are detected. LGTM label has been removed.

@ji-yaqi
Copy link
Contributor Author

ji-yaqi commented Feb 28, 2022

/retest

@chensun
Copy link
Member

chensun commented Mar 2, 2022

/test kubeflow-pipeline-e2e-test

@chensun
Copy link
Member

chensun commented Mar 2, 2022

/test kubeflow-pipelines-samples-v2

@ji-yaqi
Copy link
Contributor Author

ji-yaqi commented Mar 3, 2022

/retest-required

1 similar comment
@ji-yaqi
Copy link
Contributor Author

ji-yaqi commented Mar 3, 2022

/retest-required

@chensun
Copy link
Member

chensun commented Mar 3, 2022

/test kubeflow-pipeline-e2e-test

import os

import kfp
import kfp.onprem
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We should make this sample work, as it's one of the pre-load sample pipelines shipped with KFP release. Removing this sample is actually the cause for the backend e2e test failure.
What was the issue if we use kfp.deprecated here?

@google-oss-prow
Copy link

google-oss-prow bot commented Mar 3, 2022

@ji-yaqi: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
kubeflow-pipelines-sdk-python36 06e95ea link true /test kubeflow-pipelines-sdk-python36

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@google-oss-prow
Copy link

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

Approval requirements bypassed by manually added approval.

This pull-request has been approved by:

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@google-oss-prow google-oss-prow bot merged commit b693909 into kubeflow:master Mar 4, 2022
@ji-yaqi ji-yaqi deleted the namespace_pr branch March 4, 2022 00:54
@droctothorpe
Copy link
Contributor

droctothorpe commented Mar 4, 2022

I'm preparing a PR to the Client class in what's now deprecated/_client.py. Are there plans to replace that client in v2? Is there a timeline for that? If so, contributing to the deprecated client might not be an effective use of my time.

abaland pushed a commit to abaland/pipelines that referenced this pull request May 29, 2022
* chore(sdk): move v1 to deprecated

* fix testsg

* fix testsg

* fix setup.py

* fix test

* s'

* fix tests

* fix test

* retore v2 test changes

* fix py3.6 test

* fix py3.6 test

* fix py3.6 import fallback error

* remove deprecated

* fix samples test

* sample test

* fix samples

* add readme

* restroe test

* python require

* remove path

* fix tests

* inteegration tests

* remove tfx tests for dependency with kfp v1

* fix e2e

* fix e2e

* fix integration tests

* fix sampe

* move client down

* change to kfp

* add import alias

* fix

* runid

* fix dsl

* only use kfp for function

* revert train_until_good

* tfx test

* kfp

* try import

* onprem
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants