Look for fully-qualified job role label in Python sdk

[person142]

What this PR does / why we need it: Currently certain operations like tailing logs from the Python sdk fail against the latest version of the training operator due to a label mismatch; fix that. With this patch I can now tail the logs of a TFJob with the training operator deployed from 1.4 and from master.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #1587.

Checklist:

• Docs included if any changes are user facing

[aws-kf-ci-bot]

Hi @person142. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubeflow member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[coveralls]

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 2431145721

• 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
• 9 unchanged lines in 1 file lost coverage.
• Overall coverage decreased (-0.06%) to 37.355%

---

Files with Coverage Reduction	New Missed Lines	%
pkg/controller.v1/pytorch/pytorchjob_controller.go	9	62.25%

Totals
Change from base Build 2428014746:	-0.06%
Covered Lines:	2313
Relevant Lines:	6192

---

💛 - Coveralls

[gaocegege]

/ok-to-test

[gaocegege]

/retest

[aws-kf-ci-bot]

@person142: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests:

Test name	Commit	Details	Rerun command
kubeflow-training-operator-presubmit	c1c155e	link	/test kubeflow-training-operator-presubmit

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

[person142]

IIUC, the test failure:

https://argo.kubeflow-testing.com/workflows/kubeflow-test-infra/kubeflow-training-operator-presubmit-v1-1588-c1c155e-5024-fd99?tab=workflow&nodeId=kubeflow-training-operator-presubmit-v1-1588-c1c155e-5024-fd99-584306740&sidePanel=logs%3Akubeflow-training-operator-presubmit-v1-1588-c1c155e-5024-fd99-584306740%3Amain

is the issue being handled in #1582, so nothing to do for now but sit tight?

[johnugeorge]

Can you rebase?

[person142]

Rebased!

[johnugeorge]

/lgtm
/approve

[google-oss-prow]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: johnugeorge, person142

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• sdk/python/OWNERS [johnugeorge]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment