Security context additions to khchecks

[2infinitee]

Need your thoughts on these changes to the helm charts.

1. Should user and fsgroup be 999 or 1000. I got a bit confused since there was already a security context value for the user.
2. Are the security context where they should be.

I added these fields into each of the khchecks pod spec:

  podSpec:
    securityContext:
      runAsUser: {{ .Values.securityContext.runAsUser }}
      fsGroup: {{ .Values.securityContext.fsGroup }}

and in the container spec:

      securityContext:
        runAsUser: {{ .Values.securityContext.runAsUser }}
        fsGroup: {{ .Values.securityContext.fsGroup }}

can be adjusted in the values.yaml file under:

securityContext:
  runAsNonRoot: true
  runAsUser: 999
  fsGroup: 999
  allowPrivilegeEscalation: false
  readOnlyRootFilesystem: true

[2infinitee]

#400 tagging issue

[2infinitee]

@NissesSenap does this look about right to what you were asking for?

[NissesSenap]

I have tried it and it works with a workaround for me.
If you can implement my review comment as well then I won't even need to do a workaround :).

Thanks for checking @2infinitee

[2infinitee]

last bits of changes

[jonnydawg]

Nice!