Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update example values and KKPConfig to respect OIDC settings #8851

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Feb 10, 2022

Conversation

michalvanco
Copy link

What does this PR do / Why do we need it:
There were a misleading steps in the example values around the configuration of dex clients and KKPConfiguration.

Value of issuerClientSecret belongs to the issuer == used for accessing kubeconfig of user clusters via OIDC authentication.

And thus is actually not needed if users don't use that option.

It was discovered during the investigation of related issue - #8723.

Right now the situation was misleading because issuerClientSecret is not connected with the usage of kubermatic client (that is used for access KKP dahboard).

Does this PR close any issues?:
Fixes #

Special notes for your reviewer:

Documentation:
No updates in docs needed.

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?:

Update example values and KubermaticConfiguration to respect OIDC settings

There were a misleading steps in the example values around the configuration of dex clients and KKPConfiguration.

Value of `issuerClientSecret` belongs to the issuer == used for accessing kubeconfig of user clusters via OIDC authentication.

And thus is actually not needed if users don't use that option.

It was discovered during the investigation of related issue - kubermatic#8723.

Right now the situation was misleading because `issuerClientSecret` is not connected with the usage of `kubermatic` client (that is used for access KKP dahboard).
@kubermatic-bot kubermatic-bot added release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. dco-signoff: yes Denotes that all commits in the pull request have the valid DCO signoff message. sig/app-management Denotes a PR or issue as being assigned to SIG App Management. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Feb 3, 2022
@michalvanco
Copy link
Author

/assign @zreigz

@zreigz
Copy link
Contributor

zreigz commented Feb 3, 2022

perfecto 👍
/lgtm

someone from app-management has to approve

@kubermatic-bot kubermatic-bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Feb 3, 2022
@kubermatic-bot
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM label has been added.

Git tree hash: cb8acaea3bb415c7742751d38ac91efcf942acc3

@toschneck
Copy link
Member

/lgtm

@michalvanco
Copy link
Author

/retest

Copy link
Contributor

@xrstf xrstf left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/approve

@kubermatic-bot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: michalvanco, xrstf

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@kubermatic-bot kubermatic-bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Feb 10, 2022
@kubermatic-triage-bot
Copy link

/retest
This bot automatically retries jobs that failed/flaked on approved PRs

Review the full test history

Silence the bot with an /lgtm cancel or /hold comment for consistent failures.

@kubermatic-bot kubermatic-bot merged commit eceb5db into kubermatic:master Feb 10, 2022
@michalvanco
Copy link
Author

/cherrypick release/v2.20 release/v2.19

@kubermatic-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@michalvanco: cannot checkout release/v2.20 release/v2.19: error checking out release/v2.20 release/v2.19: exit status 1. output: error: pathspec 'release/v2.20 release/v2.19' did not match any file(s) known to git

In response to this:

/cherrypick release/v2.20 release/v2.19

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@michalvanco
Copy link
Author

/cherrypick release/v2.20

@kubermatic-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@michalvanco: new pull request created: #8944

In response to this:

/cherrypick release/v2.20

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@michalvanco
Copy link
Author

/cherrypick release/v2.19

@kubermatic-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@michalvanco: new pull request created: #8945

In response to this:

/cherrypick release/v2.19

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

michalvanco pushed a commit to kubermatic-labs/trainings that referenced this pull request Feb 10, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. dco-signoff: yes Denotes that all commits in the pull request have the valid DCO signoff message. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. sig/app-management Denotes a PR or issue as being assigned to SIG App Management. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

6 participants