Determine where the right home for client extensions are...

[brendandburns]

When I wrote Exec I placed it in the util directory, because I wanted everything in kubernetes to be generated code.

When @mbohlool added Watch he placed it in kubernetes

We should only place clients in one place. This issue is to figure out where that is.

@mbohlool , @lwander I think separating generated from non-generated code is the right idea as it will make management easier in the long term. What do you think?

Thanks!

[mbohlool]

Yes. Python client has that distinction. That was a mistake on my side. I will move watch to util package. We eventually should move all non generated code into java-core repo to follow clients guideline. On Jun 30, 2017 8:58 PM, "Brendan Burns" <notifications@github.com> wrote: When I wrote Exec I placed it in the util directory, because I wanted everything in kubernetes to be generated code. When @mbohlool <https://github.com/mbohlool> added Watch he placed it in kubernetes We should only place clients in one place. This issue is to figure out where that is. @mbohlool <https://github.com/mbohlool> , @lwander <https://github.com/lwander> I think separating generated from non-generated code is the right idea as it will make management easier in the long term. What do you think? Thanks! — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#45>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABic4AmaC9p5DKBGs-bKUZfFa21JItBmks5sJcQCgaJpZM4OLNNv> .

[lwander]

Agreed - SGTM

[brendandburns]

Closing this since we have consensus (and I merged @mbohlool's move of the Watch API)