Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

PVC Consideration #6

Closed
jrnt30 opened this issue Sep 11, 2017 · 7 comments
Closed

PVC Consideration #6

jrnt30 opened this issue Sep 11, 2017 · 7 comments
Assignees
Labels
kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed.

Comments

@jrnt30
Copy link

jrnt30 commented Sep 11, 2017

Project looks interesting! One consideration on the "Future Roadmap" that would be worth considering is the Fault Domains and the PVCs that are associated with a pod.

"Evicting" the pod with a PVC due to LowNodeUtilization on another node would not result in actual re-placement of that pod, so it shouldn't be attempted.

@ravisantoshgudimetla ravisantoshgudimetla self-assigned this Jan 3, 2018
@ravisantoshgudimetla
Copy link
Contributor

ravisantoshgudimetla commented Jan 3, 2018

@jrnt30 - Eviction of pod with a PVC seems unreasonable as this may cause data loss. So, descheduler should not do this. But I will add this to a later release.

@ravisantoshgudimetla ravisantoshgudimetla added kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. release-0.5 labels Jan 3, 2018
@ravisantoshgudimetla ravisantoshgudimetla modified the milestone: release-0.5 Jan 3, 2018
@ravisantoshgudimetla ravisantoshgudimetla added this to the Future-release milestone Jan 3, 2018
@jrnt30
Copy link
Author

jrnt30 commented Jan 3, 2018

Thanks for the response. To be a bit more clear about what I was hoping to resolve is:

  • Descheduler sees a node is Under Utilized and wants to evict pods
  • Pods are descheduled from nodes
  • A specific pod (such as one in a stateful set or with a PVC) has a volume associated with it however there is no excess capacity on any nodes in the same fault domain (AWS AZ, Azure Zone, etc.) so the K8 Scheduler is unable at actually place the Pod again

At this point either a smart cluster autoscaler or operator would need to get involved to either uncordon the node or create a new node in the proper AZ to provide adequate headroom to place the pod again.

@ravisantoshgudimetla
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for providing the entire use-case.

Pods are descheduled from nodes

I believe this shouldn't happen in first place.

@fejta-bot
Copy link

Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale.
Stale issues rot after an additional 30d of inactivity and eventually close.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta.
/lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Apr 22, 2019
@fejta-bot
Copy link

Stale issues rot after 30d of inactivity.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten.
Rotten issues close after an additional 30d of inactivity.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta.
/lifecycle rotten

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. and removed lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. labels May 22, 2019
@fejta-bot
Copy link

Rotten issues close after 30d of inactivity.
Reopen the issue with /reopen.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten.

Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta.
/close

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@fejta-bot: Closing this issue.

In response to this:

Rotten issues close after 30d of inactivity.
Reopen the issue with /reopen.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten.

Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta.
/close

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants