Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add namespaceOverride support #2052

Conversation

RuStyC0der
Copy link
Contributor

PR regarding issue #2050

Copy link

linux-foundation-easycla bot commented Jun 5, 2024

CLA Signed

The committers listed above are authorized under a signed CLA.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the cncf-cla: no Indicates the PR's author has not signed the CNCF CLA. label Jun 5, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Welcome @RuStyC0der!

It looks like this is your first PR to kubernetes-sigs/aws-ebs-csi-driver 🎉. Please refer to our pull request process documentation to help your PR have a smooth ride to approval.

You will be prompted by a bot to use commands during the review process. Do not be afraid to follow the prompts! It is okay to experiment. Here is the bot commands documentation.

You can also check if kubernetes-sigs/aws-ebs-csi-driver has its own contribution guidelines.

You may want to refer to our testing guide if you run into trouble with your tests not passing.

If you are having difficulty getting your pull request seen, please follow the recommended escalation practices. Also, for tips and tricks in the contribution process you may want to read the Kubernetes contributor cheat sheet. We want to make sure your contribution gets all the attention it needs!

Thank you, and welcome to Kubernetes. 😃

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. label Jun 5, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @RuStyC0der. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. and removed cncf-cla: no Indicates the PR's author has not signed the CNCF CLA. labels Jun 5, 2024
@torredil
Copy link
Member

torredil commented Jun 5, 2024

/ok-to-test

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. and removed needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels Jun 5, 2024
Copy link
Member

@torredil torredil left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you for the contribution!

/lgtm

charts/aws-ebs-csi-driver/values.yaml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
charts/aws-ebs-csi-driver/values.yaml Show resolved Hide resolved
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jun 6, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@AndrewSirenko AndrewSirenko left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Will lgtm after nits. Thank you!

charts/aws-ebs-csi-driver/values.yaml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
charts/aws-ebs-csi-driver/values.yaml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jun 6, 2024
@RuStyC0der RuStyC0der requested a review from torredil June 6, 2024 14:26
Copy link
Contributor

@ConnorJC3 ConnorJC3 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please also add the changes from _node.tpl to _node-windows.tpl - Otherwise lgtm

Edit: Also, you'll have to rebase your PR after we fix the govulncheck issue, will let you know when that's ready

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jun 6, 2024

Code Coverage Diff

This PR does not change the code coverage

@RuStyC0der RuStyC0der requested a review from ConnorJC3 June 6, 2024 14:57
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Jun 6, 2024
Copy link
Contributor Author

@RuStyC0der RuStyC0der left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

also found out that ebs-csi-node-getter-binding needs namespace override support to get properly bound

@rdpsin
Copy link
Contributor

rdpsin commented Jun 6, 2024

Can you squash your commits into one? Thanks.

@AndrewSirenko
Copy link
Contributor

/label tide/merge-method-squash

Can you squash your commits into one?

Prow got some upgrades @rdpsin 😄

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the tide/merge-method-squash Denotes a PR that should be squashed by tide when it merges. label Jun 7, 2024
@ConnorJC3
Copy link
Contributor

Unfortunately, you will need to rebase on top of the latest master to make govulncheck happy - once you do that we can merge this in.

@RuStyC0der
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hi @ConnorJC3, just rebased master commits)

@RuStyC0der
Copy link
Contributor Author

/test pull-aws-ebs-csi-driver-external-test-arm64

@AndrewSirenko
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jun 9, 2024
@RuStyC0der
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hi, if there is no more issues, shall we get this PR merged?

@ConnorJC3
Copy link
Contributor

/approve

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: ConnorJC3

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jun 10, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 86bde20 into kubernetes-sigs:master Jun 10, 2024
19 checks passed
@RuStyC0der
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thank all you guys for reviewing this PR) Hope my small enhancement will be useful)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. tide/merge-method-squash Denotes a PR that should be squashed by tide when it merges.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

6 participants