Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Revert "Fix kustomize RBAC bindings to have namespace kube-system" #947

Merged

Conversation

therealdwright
Copy link
Contributor

@therealdwright therealdwright commented Jun 22, 2021

This reverts commit 3716e5ef3175bdbb6745018f9646957b5a635eac

Is this a bug fix or adding new feature?
Fixes #946 946

What is this PR about? / Why do we need it?
Issue described in ticket

What testing is done?

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for your pull request. Before we can look at your pull request, you'll need to sign a Contributor License Agreement (CLA).

📝 Please follow instructions at https://git.k8s.io/community/CLA.md#the-contributor-license-agreement to sign the CLA.

It may take a couple minutes for the CLA signature to be fully registered; after that, please reply here with a new comment and we'll verify. Thanks.


Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the cncf-cla: no Indicates the PR's author has not signed the CNCF CLA. label Jun 22, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Welcome @therealdwright!

It looks like this is your first PR to kubernetes-sigs/aws-ebs-csi-driver 🎉. Please refer to our pull request process documentation to help your PR have a smooth ride to approval.

You will be prompted by a bot to use commands during the review process. Do not be afraid to follow the prompts! It is okay to experiment. Here is the bot commands documentation.

You can also check if kubernetes-sigs/aws-ebs-csi-driver has its own contribution guidelines.

You may want to refer to our testing guide if you run into trouble with your tests not passing.

If you are having difficulty getting your pull request seen, please follow the recommended escalation practices. Also, for tips and tricks in the contribution process you may want to read the Kubernetes contributor cheat sheet. We want to make sure your contribution gets all the attention it needs!

Thank you, and welcome to Kubernetes. 😃

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @therealdwright. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. label Jun 22, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. label Jun 22, 2021
@therealdwright
Copy link
Contributor Author

"I signed it"

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. and removed cncf-cla: no Indicates the PR's author has not signed the CNCF CLA. labels Jun 22, 2021
@krmichel
Copy link
Contributor

After a little reading, since I have not used kustomize, it looks like they have special handling to adjust the namespace for role bindings and cluster role bindings if the manifest has default set as the namespace for the subjects field. So, given I have no experience with this, it seems like this is the kustomzie way to handle bindings.

https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/kustomize/blob/release-kustomize-v4.2/api/filters/namespace/namespace.go#L93-L106

@wongma7
Copy link
Contributor

wongma7 commented Jun 22, 2021

thanks, I was not aware kustomize already handled this for us as long as we leave it "default"

/lgtm
/ok-to-test
/approve

I'll cherry pick this int orelease 1.1 branch because that's where the README points.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. and removed needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels Jun 22, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jun 22, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: TheRealDwright, wongma7

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jun 22, 2021
@wongma7
Copy link
Contributor

wongma7 commented Jun 22, 2021

2021-06-22 19:00:44 [✖] AWS::EKS::Cluster/ControlPlane: CREATE_FAILED – "Cluster test-cluster-5973-k8s-local failed to stabilize: Internal Failure"

weird

/retest

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit a65953a into kubernetes-sigs:master Jun 22, 2021
@therealdwright therealdwright deleted the revert-kustomize-changes branch June 22, 2021 22:14
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Namespace changes in 1.1.0 breaks upgrades from 1.1.0 if not using default namespaces
4 participants