Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[Feature Request] Add the option to specify a load balancer name #1483

Closed
moosahmed opened this issue Oct 10, 2020 · 11 comments · Fixed by #1880 or #1899
Closed

[Feature Request] Add the option to specify a load balancer name #1483

moosahmed opened this issue Oct 10, 2020 · 11 comments · Fixed by #1880 or #1899
Labels
kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature.
Projects
Roadmap

Comments

@moosahmed
Copy link

Similar to Issue #360

What is the annotation to specify the alb name?
@kishorj
Copy link
Collaborator

kishorj commented Oct 13, 2020 •
edited
Loading

We do not support this feature yet.

@M00nF1sh
Copy link
Collaborator

we'll add support for this after our first v2.0.0 release. Should be fairly easy to support it.

@M00nF1sh
Copy link
Collaborator

/kind feature

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. label Oct 13, 2020
@moosahmed
Copy link
Author

Thanks,

@M00nF1sh, no rush, just wondering when you are targeting v2.0.0 release?

@lexore
Copy link

lexore commented Oct 23, 2020

Hello! I just want to say that version 2.0.0. is out and we can continue discuss this feature :-)

@M00nF1sh
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi, we'll add support to use existing LB and also this override LB name.

@M00nF1sh M00nF1sh changed the title Add the option to specify a load balancer name [Feature request] Add the option to specify a load balancer name Oct 27, 2020
@M00nF1sh M00nF1sh changed the title [Feature request] Add the option to specify a load balancer name [Feature Request] Add the option to specify a load balancer name Oct 27, 2020
@M00nF1sh M00nF1sh added this to TODO in Roadmap Oct 27, 2020
@kishorj kishorj mentioned this issue Oct 27, 2020
Closed
@M00nF1sh M00nF1sh mentioned this issue Oct 28, 2020
Closed
@vdahmane
Copy link

vdahmane commented Dec 3, 2020

Hello, do you have ETA for this feature?

@kishorj kishorj mentioned this issue Jan 26, 2021
Closed
@seivan seivan mentioned this issue Feb 15, 2021
Closed
@LevonBecker
Copy link

How about now? We're on v2.1.3... This feature is important to us for chargeback of stacks etc. Plus it makes easy to filter ALBs for a specific stack etc.

Thanks in advance!

This was referenced Mar 10, 2021
Closed
Merged
@kishorj
Copy link
Collaborator

kishorj commented Mar 13, 2021

/reopen
need to support for ingress as well

@kishorj kishorj reopened this Mar 13, 2021
@kishorj kishorj mentioned this issue Mar 20, 2021
Merged
@pcolazurdo
Copy link

Will this feature allow to reuse existing NLBs? This is important to avoid having to recreate multiple Private Link configuration if for any reason the LoadBalancer has to be removed. Allowing the Controller to manage an existing NLB allows (which is connected to a Private Link) allow us to replace the service without having to ask the receiving end to recreate all the Private Endpoints setups

@kishorj
Copy link
Collaborator

kishorj commented Mar 23, 2021

@pcolazurdo, this feature is for specifying a custom load balancer name via annotation.

#1573 is the one for reusing existing LB.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature.
Projects
Roadmap
TODO
Milestone
No milestone
8 participants
@lexore @pcolazurdo @LevonBecker @kishorj @k8s-ci-robot @vdahmane @moosahmed @M00nF1sh