Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

✨ Add support for extra AWS policies in clusterawsadm #1426

Conversation

johnharris85
Copy link

What this PR does / why we need it:
Convenience feature to allow users to specify extra policies to the control plane and node roles that clusterawsadm creates.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #1390

Signed-off-by: John Harris joharris@vmware.com

Signed-off-by: John Harris <joharris@vmware.com>
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. label Dec 16, 2019
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @johnharris85. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Dec 16, 2019
@aaroniscode
Copy link
Contributor

/ok-to-test

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. and removed needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels Dec 16, 2019
@randomvariable
Copy link
Member

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Dec 16, 2019
@vincepri
Copy link
Member

/approve

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: johnharris85, vincepri

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Dec 16, 2019
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit b94a2ea into kubernetes-sigs:master Dec 16, 2019
@ncdc
Copy link
Contributor

ncdc commented Dec 16, 2019

@johnharris85 this change broke our e2e code: https://prow.k8s.io/view/gcs/kubernetes-jenkins/logs/ci-cluster-api-provider-aws-e2e-master/1206646250376531968. Would you be able to fix it? I opened #1428

@johnharris85
Copy link
Author

johnharris85 commented Dec 16, 2019 via email

k8s-ci-robot added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 17, 2019
…onal-policies

🐛 Fix broken e2e test caused by #1426
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Clusterawsadm: Enable adding of additional policies to control plane & node roles
6 participants