Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Check UserManaged is not nil in azure/converters/diagnostics #4819

Conversation

Patryk-Stefanski
Copy link
Contributor

@Patryk-Stefanski Patryk-Stefanski commented May 7, 2024

What this PR does / why we need it: Adds nil check for UserManagedDiagnosticsStorage in azure/converters/diagnostics.go . This prevents a crash in the case that the StorageAccountURI provided is empty.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes (optional, in fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...) format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged):
Fixes #

Special notes for your reviewer:

  • cherry-pick candidate

TODOs:

  • squashed commits
  • includes documentation
  • adds unit tests

Release note:

Adds nil check for UserManagedDiagnosticsStorage in azure/converters/diagnostics.go 

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. label May 7, 2024
Copy link

linux-foundation-easycla bot commented May 7, 2024

CLA Signed

The committers listed above are authorized under a signed CLA.

  • ✅ login: Patryk-Stefanski / name: Patryk Stefanski (d8f1e9d)

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the cncf-cla: no Indicates the PR's author has not signed the CNCF CLA. label May 7, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Welcome @Patryk-Stefanski!

It looks like this is your first PR to kubernetes-sigs/cluster-api-provider-azure 🎉. Please refer to our pull request process documentation to help your PR have a smooth ride to approval.

You will be prompted by a bot to use commands during the review process. Do not be afraid to follow the prompts! It is okay to experiment. Here is the bot commands documentation.

You can also check if kubernetes-sigs/cluster-api-provider-azure has its own contribution guidelines.

You may want to refer to our testing guide if you run into trouble with your tests not passing.

If you are having difficulty getting your pull request seen, please follow the recommended escalation practices. Also, for tips and tricks in the contribution process you may want to read the Kubernetes contributor cheat sheet. We want to make sure your contribution gets all the attention it needs!

Thank you, and welcome to Kubernetes. 😃

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. label May 7, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @Patryk-Stefanski. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. label May 7, 2024
@Patryk-Stefanski
Copy link
Contributor Author

/kind bug

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. and removed cncf-cla: no Indicates the PR's author has not signed the CNCF CLA. labels May 7, 2024
@enxebre
Copy link
Member

enxebre commented May 7, 2024

/ok-to-test

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. and removed needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels May 7, 2024
@enxebre
Copy link
Member

enxebre commented May 7, 2024

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label May 7, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM label has been added.

Git tree hash: 2d5a49dd2b6615d2ee8c41c705b264908af0f80f

Enabled: ptr.To(true),
StorageURI: &diagnostics.Boot.UserManaged.StorageAccountURI,
},
if diagnostics.Boot.UserManaged != nil {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

can we add a new UT case "nil diagnostics.Boot.UserManaged" to the TestGetDiagnosticsProfile spec under azure/converters/diagnostics_test.go?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

thank you!

Copy link

codecov bot commented May 7, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 62.01%. Comparing base (d817ab3) to head (d8f1e9d).
Report is 65 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #4819      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   62.48%   62.01%   -0.47%     
==========================================
  Files         196      201       +5     
  Lines       16188    16858     +670     
==========================================
+ Hits        10115    10455     +340     
- Misses       5333     5620     +287     
- Partials      740      783      +43     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label May 9, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot requested a review from enxebre May 9, 2024 11:00
@Patryk-Stefanski Patryk-Stefanski force-pushed the DiagnosticsUserManagedNilCheck branch 2 times, most recently from e4e61ad to b47586c Compare May 9, 2024 11:05
@mboersma
Copy link
Contributor

mboersma commented May 9, 2024

/assign @jackfrancis

@nojnhuh
Copy link
Contributor

nojnhuh commented May 9, 2024

@Patryk-Stefanski Please squash your commits when you've gotten LGTM. Thanks!
/hold

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label May 9, 2024
@jackfrancis
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label May 9, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM label has been added.

Git tree hash: 28f27fc96f836c5a8a484e572caab4ef95a5033b

@nojnhuh
Copy link
Contributor

nojnhuh commented May 9, 2024

Thank you for squashing!
/hold cancel

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label May 9, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@nojnhuh nojnhuh left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm
/approve
/cherry-pick release-1.14
/cherry-pick release-1.15

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: nojnhuh

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label May 9, 2024
@jackfrancis
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

1 similar comment
@nojnhuh
Copy link
Contributor

nojnhuh commented May 9, 2024

/retest

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 43e72a9 into kubernetes-sigs:main May 9, 2024
19 checks passed
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added this to the v1.15 milestone May 9, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
Status: Done
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

6 participants