Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

🐛Make sure that allowedCidrs lists are compared correctly to avoid patching LB listener when not needed #1854

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 9, 2024

Conversation

huxcrux
Copy link
Contributor

@huxcrux huxcrux commented Feb 1, 2024

What this PR does / why we need it:
This PR makes sure that allowedCidrs isn't patched on a listener when comparing a list that is out of order.

I noticed this bug due to my second listener never being created when using multiple listeners together with allowedCidrs.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes (optional, in fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...) format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged):
A part of #1687

Special notes for your reviewer:
I do not know if CompareLists is a good function name. If any other names are preferred just let me know.

  1. Please confirm that if this PR changes any image versions, then that's the sole change this PR makes.

TODOs:

  • squashed commits
  • if necessary:
    • includes documentation
    • adds unit tests

/hold

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Feb 1, 2024
Copy link

netlify bot commented Feb 1, 2024

Deploy Preview for kubernetes-sigs-cluster-api-openstack ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 9e356ad
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/kubernetes-sigs-cluster-api-openstack/deploys/65bd040663b85a00076e8110
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-1854--kubernetes-sigs-cluster-api-openstack.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. label Feb 1, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. label Feb 1, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @huxcrux. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. label Feb 1, 2024
@EmilienM
Copy link
Contributor

EmilienM commented Feb 2, 2024

/ok-to-test

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. and removed needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels Feb 2, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@EmilienM EmilienM left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for your contribution, just add unit tests (example provided) and I think we're good with this nasty bug!

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Feb 2, 2024
@mdbooth
Copy link
Contributor

mdbooth commented Feb 2, 2024

/approve

Incidentally I noodled this, which uses the slices package to remove a bunch of boilerplate: shiftstack@e78e77e

You're welcome to use it or not.

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: huxcrux, mdbooth

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Feb 2, 2024
@dulek
Copy link
Contributor

dulek commented Feb 2, 2024

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Feb 2, 2024
@huxcrux
Copy link
Contributor Author

huxcrux commented Feb 2, 2024

/approve

Incidentally I noodled this, which uses the slices package to remove a bunch of boilerplate: shiftstack@e78e77e

You're welcome to use it or not.

The change looks clean, I'll use it and squash all commits :)

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Feb 2, 2024
@huxcrux
Copy link
Contributor Author

huxcrux commented Feb 2, 2024

@huxcrux: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
pull-cluster-api-provider-openstack-e2e-test 06d940a link true /test pull-cluster-api-provider-openstack-e2e-test
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Please help us cut down on flakes by linking to an open issue when you hit one in your PR.

Created #1857 to push Dockerfile to golang 1.21

This PR needs to be rebased after the linked PR is merged for tests to pass

@mdbooth
Copy link
Contributor

mdbooth commented Feb 2, 2024

@huxcrux If you would like to apply for membership of kubernetes-sigs I will happily sponsor you. It will mean you can use /lgtm and don't need /ok-to-test.

https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/community-membership.md

@mdbooth
Copy link
Contributor

mdbooth commented Feb 2, 2024

/retest-required

@huxcrux
Copy link
Contributor Author

huxcrux commented Feb 2, 2024

@huxcrux If you would like to apply for membership of kubernetes-sigs I will happily sponsor you. It will mean you can use /lgtm and don't need /ok-to-test.

https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/community-membership.md

Looks like it could be a good idea, i'll submit a request later today and add you as one of my sponsors :) thanks in advance

@EmilienM
Copy link
Contributor

EmilienM commented Feb 2, 2024

@huxcrux If you would like to apply for membership of kubernetes-sigs I will happily sponsor you. It will mean you can use /lgtm and don't need /ok-to-test.
https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/community-membership.md

Looks like it could be a good idea, i'll submit a request later today and add you as one of my sponsors :) thanks in advance

you can add me too.

@huxcrux
Copy link
Contributor Author

huxcrux commented Feb 2, 2024

/unhold

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Feb 2, 2024
@dulek
Copy link
Contributor

dulek commented Feb 8, 2024

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Feb 8, 2024
@huxcrux
Copy link
Contributor Author

huxcrux commented Feb 8, 2024

/test pull-cluster-api-provider-openstack-e2e-test

1 similar comment
@huxcrux
Copy link
Contributor Author

huxcrux commented Feb 9, 2024

/test pull-cluster-api-provider-openstack-e2e-test

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 622defd into kubernetes-sigs:main Feb 9, 2024
9 checks passed
@huxcrux huxcrux deleted the compare-cidr-fix branch February 9, 2024 14:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants