Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

🐛 Adds Kind to ipaddress pool name index #1864

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 9, 2024
Merged

🐛 Adds Kind to ipaddress pool name index #1864

merged 1 commit into from
Feb 9, 2024

Conversation

bilbobrovall
Copy link
Contributor

What this PR does / why we need it:
Checks kind index for IPAddresses in OpenStackFloatingIPPool controller

Which issue(s) this PR fixes (optional, in fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...) format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged):
Fixes #1863

Special notes for your reviewer:

  • squashed commits
  • if necessary:
    • includes documentation
    • adds unit tests

/hold

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Feb 6, 2024
@netlify Netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented Feb 6, 2024 •
edited

✅ Deploy Preview for kubernetes-sigs-cluster-api-openstack ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 8fe1c8f
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/kubernetes-sigs-cluster-api-openstack/deploys/65c248e5ce2cc2000894e184
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-1864--kubernetes-sigs-cluster-api-openstack.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. label Feb 6, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. label Feb 6, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @bilbobrovall. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. label Feb 6, 2024
@jichenjc
Copy link
Contributor

jichenjc commented Feb 7, 2024

/ok-to-test

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. and removed needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels Feb 7, 2024
jichenjc
jichenjc reviewed Feb 7, 2024
View reviewed changes
controllers/openstackfloatingippool_controller.go
@@ -456,6 +456,9 @@ func (r *OpenStackFloatingIPPoolReconciler) SetupWithManager(ctx context.Context

if err := mgr.GetFieldIndexer().IndexField(ctx, &ipamv1.IPAddress{}, infrav1alpha1.OpenStackFloatingIPPoolNameIndex, func(rawObj client.Object) []string {
ip := rawObj.(*ipamv1.IPAddress)
if ip.Spec.PoolRef.Kind != openStackFloatingIPPool {
return nil
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

seems align with above line 449 so seems fine to me

@jichenjc
Copy link
Contributor

jichenjc commented Feb 7, 2024

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Feb 7, 2024
@bilbobrovall
Copy link
Contributor Author

/hold cancel

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Feb 7, 2024
lentzi90
lentzi90 reviewed Feb 9, 2024
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@lentzi90 lentzi90 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/approve

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: bilbobrovall, lentzi90

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Feb 9, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 4d81532 into kubernetes-sigs:main Feb 9, 2024
9 checks passed
@huxcrux huxcrux deleted the fix_pool_name_index branch March 9, 2024 13:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@lentzi90 lentzi90 lentzi90 left review comments

@jichenjc jichenjc jichenjc left review comments

@mdbooth mdbooth Awaiting requested review from mdbooth

Assignees

@jichenjc jichenjc

Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

OpenStackFloatingIPPool: IPAddress index should include check kind
4 participants
@bilbobrovall @k8s-ci-robot @jichenjc @lentzi90