Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We鈥檒l occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

馃尡 Use runtime.Unstructured interface instead of Unstructured struct #2168

Merged

Conversation

vincepri
Copy link
Member

@vincepri vincepri commented Feb 2, 2023

Signed-off-by: Vince Prignano vincepri@redhat.com

Fixes #415

I'm indifferent if we actually want to do this or not, if we decide not to, we should also close the related issue as well

Signed-off-by: Vince Prignano <vincepri@redhat.com>
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. label Feb 2, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Feb 2, 2023
@vincepri vincepri changed the title Use runtime.Unstructured interface instead of Unstructured struct 馃尡 Use runtime.Unstructured interface instead of Unstructured struct Feb 2, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. label Feb 2, 2023
@vincepri
Copy link
Member Author

vincepri commented Feb 2, 2023

/assign @alvaroaleman @sbueringer

@FillZpp
Copy link
Contributor

FillZpp commented Feb 3, 2023

I'm indifferent if we actually want to do this or not, if we decide not to, we should also close the related issue as well

I'm in favor of this. The code looks more clear and we don't have to check both Unstructured and UnstructuredList in some of the places.

Copy link
Member

@alvaroaleman alvaroaleman left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks like a clear simplification to me and doesn't result in any public api changes or test changes

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Feb 3, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: alvaroaleman, vincepri

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
  • OWNERS [alvaroaleman,vincepri]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 304c53c into kubernetes-sigs:master Feb 3, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

unstructured client should key off of the unstructured interface
5 participants