Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Removes logic that checks for a "port already in use" error #189

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 1, 2018
Merged

Removes logic that checks for a "port already in use" error #189

merged 1 commit into from
Nov 1, 2018

Conversation

mjnichol2
Copy link
Contributor

Instead, retry on any error.

The "port already in use" error is only present in
the stderr logs of the separate process (etcd or apiserver) and will
not be surfaced in the go error.

Checking the stderr logs is an alternative solution, but it's
fragile (the message could change in the future and varies across
operating systems).

retries on any error. The "port already in use" error is only present in
the stderr logs of the separate process (etcd or apiserver) and will
not be surfaced in the go error.

Checking the stderr logs is an alternative solution, but it's
fragile (the message could change in the future and varies across
operating systems).
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. label Oct 31, 2018
@mengqiy mengqiy requested review from droot and mengqiy and removed request for pwittrock October 31, 2018 19:42
@mengqiy
Copy link
Member

mengqiy commented Oct 31, 2018

LGTM
Let's wait for some time before tagging it for merging in case @droot and @DirectXMan12 want to take a look.

@droot droot added lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. labels Nov 1, 2018
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

Approval requirements bypassed by manually added approval.

This pull-request has been approved by: mjnichol2

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@mjnichol2
Copy link
Contributor Author

/check-cla

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. label Nov 1, 2018
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 8a1511d into kubernetes-sigs:master Nov 1, 2018
@mjnichol2 mjnichol2 deleted the mjnichol2 branch November 1, 2018 18:23
justinsb pushed a commit to justinsb/controller-runtime that referenced this pull request Dec 7, 2018
Removes logic that checks for a "port already in use" error
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants