Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

🐛 Fixed panic when parsing selector expressions containing composite literals #648

Conversation

kralicky
Copy link
Contributor

This fixes #613

Signed-off-by: Joe Kralicky joe.kralicky@suse.com

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for your pull request. Before we can look at your pull request, you'll need to sign a Contributor License Agreement (CLA).

📝 Please follow instructions at https://git.k8s.io/community/CLA.md#the-contributor-license-agreement to sign the CLA.

It may take a couple minutes for the CLA signature to be fully registered; after that, please reply here with a new comment and we'll verify. Thanks.


Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@linux-foundation-easycla
Copy link

linux-foundation-easycla bot commented Dec 13, 2021

CLA Signed

The committers are authorized under a signed CLA.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the cncf-cla: no Indicates the PR's author has not signed the CNCF CLA. label Dec 13, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Welcome @kralicky!

It looks like this is your first PR to kubernetes-sigs/controller-tools 🎉. Please refer to our pull request process documentation to help your PR have a smooth ride to approval.

You will be prompted by a bot to use commands during the review process. Do not be afraid to follow the prompts! It is okay to experiment. Here is the bot commands documentation.

You can also check if kubernetes-sigs/controller-tools has its own contribution guidelines.

You may want to refer to our testing guide if you run into trouble with your tests not passing.

If you are having difficulty getting your pull request seen, please follow the recommended escalation practices. Also, for tips and tricks in the contribution process you may want to read the Kubernetes contributor cheat sheet. We want to make sure your contribution gets all the attention it needs!

Thank you, and welcome to Kubernetes. 😃

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. label Dec 13, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @kralicky. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. label Dec 13, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. and removed cncf-cla: no Indicates the PR's author has not signed the CNCF CLA. labels Dec 13, 2021
return nil
default:
return c
}
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

WDYT about adding a test to ensure the scenario raised?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sure thing, I will add a test.

@kralicky
Copy link
Contributor Author

@camilamacedo86 I added a field that would cause a panic (without this patch) to the test cronjob spec - let me know if this works, or if there is a better place to add a test.

@chdxD1
Copy link

chdxD1 commented Jan 21, 2022

Hey, we've hit this bug while developing an operator as well, any progress here?

@joelanford
Copy link
Member

/ok-to-test

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. and removed needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels Jan 31, 2022
@joelanford
Copy link
Member

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. labels Jan 31, 2022
@kralicky kralicky force-pushed the origin/fix-selector-expression-panic branch from 4c0de4c to 44375eb Compare January 31, 2022 19:58
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. labels Jan 31, 2022
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Feb 12, 2022
…terals

Signed-off-by: Joe Kralicky <joe.kralicky@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Joe Kralicky <joe.kralicky@suse.com>
@kralicky kralicky force-pushed the origin/fix-selector-expression-panic branch from 44375eb to 3102f89 Compare February 12, 2022 16:29
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Feb 12, 2022
@kralicky
Copy link
Contributor Author

@joelanford I had to rebase which cleared the lgtm label. Could you take another look at this? Thanks!

@AlmogBaku
Copy link
Member

AlmogBaku commented Apr 24, 2022

/lgtm

I tested it and reviewed the code - looks like it solves it neatly. Great work!
Thank you for your contribution @kralicky ! Great work

@pwittrock @joelanford can you please approve?

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Apr 24, 2022
@joelanford
Copy link
Member

/approve

Thanks!

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: AlmogBaku, joelanford, kralicky

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Apr 28, 2022
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 32ad710 into kubernetes-sigs:master Apr 28, 2022
@armsnyder
Copy link

Thanks for the fix! I'm looking forward to this being released.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

controller-gen panics when reading selector expressions containing composite literals (Go 1.17)
7 participants