-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 639
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
remove MostRequestedPriority from doc since already deprecated #733
Conversation
Hi @JaneLiuL. Thanks for your PR. I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the I understand the commands that are listed here. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/ok-to-test
README.md
Outdated
@@ -274,8 +274,7 @@ under utilized frequently or for a short period of time. By default, `numberOfNo | |||
This strategy finds nodes that are under utilized and evicts pods from the nodes in the hope that these pods will be | |||
scheduled compactly into fewer nodes. Used in conjunction with node auto-scaling, this strategy is intended to help | |||
trigger down scaling of under utilized nodes. | |||
This strategy **must** be used with the scheduler strategy `MostRequestedPriority`. The parameters of this strategy are | |||
configured under `nodeResourceUtilizationThresholds`. | |||
The parameters of this strategy are configured under `nodeResourceUtilizationThresholds`. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@JaneLiuL it's still important to mention that this has to be used with the right scheduler config, like in #668 (comment) and #668 (comment)
docs/proposals.md
Outdated
@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@ | |||
# Proposals |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
is this related to removing MostRequestedPriority?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
no, it is related to #646, i just thinking that for use one pr for fix two document related issues. is it change the pr title will be better?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
technically if it's unrelated it should probably be a different PR, to organize them better. Hope you don't mind
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
get it, i don't mind :) i will put this on a different pr :)
docs/user-guide.md
Outdated
@@ -118,7 +118,7 @@ strategies: | |||
|
|||
#### Balance low utilization nodes | |||
Using `HighNodeUtilization`, descheduler will rebalance the cluster based on memory by evicting pods | |||
from nodes with memory utilization lower than 20%. This should be used along with scheduler strategy `MostRequestedPriority`. | |||
from nodes with memory utilization lower than 20%. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
same as above, we don't just want to remove MostRequestedPriority; need to update with the new change
/approve |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: damemi, JaneLiuL The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
fix #668