use longer time if deadline is set

[sivchari]

What type of PR is this?

/kind feature

What this PR does / why we need it:

If the context deadline is set and the time is longer than default wait time, deadline time is preferred.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Fixes #

Special notes for your reviewer:

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?

Additional documentation e.g., Usage docs, etc.:

[k8s-ci-robot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: sivchari
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign shwethakumbla for approval. For more information see the Kubernetes Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[k8s-ci-robot]

Hi @sivchari. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[harshanarayana]

/ok-to-test

[vladimirvivien]

Hi @sivchari
Since kwok is a cluster provider, should this behavior implemented with other cluster providers like Kind?
cc @harshanarayana

[harshanarayana]

+1 to what @vladimirvivien mentioned. Guess this can be a general thing across each providers ?

[sivchari]

Kind has --wait flag, but it's not used in cluster provider. If we'll use it, we should new parameter to wait. Should I change it ?

[vladimirvivien]

@sivchari (apologies for late reply)
How is the Duration value passed in to Kwok as a provider ?
We should use the same mechanism to pass it to kind if possible.
If a flag is needed, we can explore that.

[sivchari]

KWOK has already had waitDruration in struct. So if Kind also has wautDuration in Cluster, we can control the duration time when to wait, can't it ?

[vladimirvivien]

@sivchari yes, but I am not sure if that is already built into kind (which would make it easier to implement).