Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

istio-gateway: Add debug logging when endpoints missing #2538

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 27, 2022
Merged

istio-gateway: Add debug logging when endpoints missing #2538

merged 1 commit into from
Apr 27, 2022

Conversation

mcwarman
Copy link
Contributor

Description

Add debug logging to istio-gateway for when an endpoint is missing, this adds logging parity to istio-virtualservice.

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for your pull request. Before we can look at your pull request, you'll need to sign a Contributor License Agreement (CLA).

📝 Please follow instructions at https://git.k8s.io/community/CLA.md#the-contributor-license-agreement to sign the CLA.

It may take a couple minutes for the CLA signature to be fully registered; after that, please reply here with a new comment and we'll verify. Thanks.


Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@linux-foundation-easycla
Copy link

linux-foundation-easycla bot commented Jan 24, 2022

CLA Signed

The committers are authorized under a signed CLA.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the cncf-cla: no Indicates the PR's author has not signed the CNCF CLA. label Jan 24, 2022
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Welcome @mcwarman!

It looks like this is your first PR to kubernetes-sigs/external-dns 🎉. Please refer to our pull request process documentation to help your PR have a smooth ride to approval.

You will be prompted by a bot to use commands during the review process. Do not be afraid to follow the prompts! It is okay to experiment. Here is the bot commands documentation.

You can also check if kubernetes-sigs/external-dns has its own contribution guidelines.

You may want to refer to our testing guide if you run into trouble with your tests not passing.

If you are having difficulty getting your pull request seen, please follow the recommended escalation practices. Also, for tips and tricks in the contribution process you may want to read the Kubernetes contributor cheat sheet. We want to make sure your contribution gets all the attention it needs!

Thank you, and welcome to Kubernetes. 😃

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. label Jan 24, 2022
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. and removed cncf-cla: no Indicates the PR's author has not signed the CNCF CLA. labels Jan 25, 2022
@@ -172,6 +172,11 @@ func (sc *gatewaySource) Endpoints(ctx context.Context) ([]*endpoint.Endpoint, e
return nil, err
}

if len(gwEndpoints) == 0 {
log.Debugf("No endpoints could be generated from gateway %s/%s", gateway.Namespace, gateway.Name)
continue
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is not only logging, adding a continue will have the effect of skipping lines 180 to 182. Is this desired?

Copy link
Contributor Author

@mcwarman mcwarman Jan 26, 2022

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Probably a poor description and commit message but it is the intention.

180 reports that something will be added, where actually nothing is as the gwEndpoints is empty.

Endpoints generated from gateway: example/gateway: []

181 and 182 will not do anything as there is nothing in the gwEndpoints slice.

So the intention is to break out of the loop and provide a debug message that nothing was found.

Copy link
Contributor Author

@mcwarman mcwarman Jan 28, 2022

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The continue is also present is the virtual service equivalent istio_virtualservice.go#L168-L171.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@Raffo are you happy with the description above?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@Raffo is there anything else I need to do to get this merged?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah that looks good to me.

@mcwarman mcwarman requested a review from Raffo January 26, 2022 13:06
@mcwarman
Copy link
Contributor Author

/assign @Raffo

@Raffo Raffo closed this Apr 27, 2022
@Raffo Raffo reopened this Apr 27, 2022
@Raffo
Copy link
Contributor

Raffo commented Apr 27, 2022

/approve
/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Apr 27, 2022
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: mcwarman, Raffo

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Apr 27, 2022
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 042654c into kubernetes-sigs:master Apr 27, 2022
@mcwarman mcwarman deleted the istio-gateway-logging branch April 27, 2022 16:54
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants