Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Marking ServiceImport as Extended support #1922

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 6, 2023

Conversation

robscott
Copy link
Member

@robscott robscott commented Apr 6, 2023

What type of PR is this?
/kind documentation
/kind feature

What this PR does / why we need it:
This updates the spec to note that ServiceImport has "Extended" support as a BackendRef per GEP #1748.

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?:

ServiceImports now have "Extended" support in BackendRefs

Adding a hold until #1843 merges.

/hold

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. kind/documentation Categorizes issue or PR as related to documentation. kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. labels Apr 6, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Apr 6, 2023
Copy link
Member

@shaneutt shaneutt left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why not just merge this into the other branch? Either way, lgtm.

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: robscott, shaneutt

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@robscott
Copy link
Member Author

robscott commented Apr 6, 2023

Why not just merge this into the other branch? Either way, lgtm.

Trying to keep proposal and implementation separate + didn't want to expand scope after the GEP was approved, but agree it's not entirely necessary.

@shaneutt shaneutt added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Apr 6, 2023
@shaneutt shaneutt added this to the v0.7.0 milestone Apr 6, 2023
@shaneutt
Copy link
Member

shaneutt commented Apr 6, 2023

/unhold

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Apr 6, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 4f6bdb0 into kubernetes-sigs:main Apr 6, 2023
4 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. kind/documentation Categorizes issue or PR as related to documentation. kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
No open projects
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants