Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Adjust kubelet_event_record_qps to K8S default #10826

Merged

Conversation

VannTen
Copy link
Contributor

@VannTen VannTen commented Jan 22, 2024

What type of PR is this?
/kind cleanup

What this PR does / why we need it:
Use the same default as K8S (we should not unecessarily deviate from K8S defaults)
Also remove redundant check in the kubelet config template (we define a default, so the setting will always be "true")

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Fixes #10753

Special notes for your reviewer:

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?:

eventRecordQPS (in kubelet config) now uses Kubernetes default value (50)

Also remove redundant check in the kubelet config template (we define a
default, so the setting will always be "true")
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added kind/cleanup Categorizes issue or PR as related to cleaning up code, process, or technical debt. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. labels Jan 22, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. label Jan 22, 2024
Copy link
Member

@MrFreezeex MrFreezeex left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks 👍
/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jan 22, 2024
@VannTen
Copy link
Contributor Author

VannTen commented Jan 22, 2024

/assign @mirwan @floryut

Copy link
Member

@floryut floryut left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@VannTen Thank you 👍

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: floryut, MrFreezeex, VannTen

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jan 22, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 22bb097 into kubernetes-sigs:master Jan 22, 2024
65 checks passed
pedro-peter pushed a commit to pedro-peter/kubespray that referenced this pull request May 8, 2024
Also remove redundant check in the kubelet config template (we define a
default, so the setting will always be "true")
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. kind/cleanup Categorizes issue or PR as related to cleaning up code, process, or technical debt. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Why is eventRecordQPS defaulted to 5?
5 participants