New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Kubespray for Raspberry Pi clusters #5679
Conversation
Welcome @b23prodtm! |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: b23prodtm The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
Thanks for your pull request. Before we can look at your pull request, you'll need to sign a Contributor License Agreement (CLA). 📝 Please follow instructions at https://git.k8s.io/community/CLA.md#the-contributor-license-agreement to sign the CLA. It may take a couple minutes for the CLA signature to be fully registered; after that, please reply here with a new comment and we'll verify. Thanks.
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
Just disable the RPI3 minimal requirements, it pretended to work on 3 but now it's too low for installing any new pods, I've once run up the dashboard. These were the legacy values :
|
77f438c
to
80ea352
Compare
67eac09
to
6ecfe05
Compare
7d0cba4
to
8068ce5
Compare
10ecf36
to
c6e1b8a
Compare
…nt Version Fixes: couldn't acquire lock-frontend tox-inventory-build prevent parallel jobs Fixes: CONFIG_FILE=inventory/mycluster/hosts.yaml python3 contrib/inventory_builder/inventory.py ${IPS[@]} Fixes: Ubuntu bootstrap Fixes: Found multiple CRI sockets, please use --cri-socket to select one Fixes: extended wait delays Fixes: forbidden user Fixes: kubeadm token create and crio Fixes: Terraform, molecule, manual triggers
I don't understand this pr, seems to be random changes all over the code base. |
@b23prodtm: PR needs rebase. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
#response_container_BBPPID{font-family: initial; font-size:initial; color: initial;} Hi , Thank you for reporting any feedback. This pretends to run kubespray with raspberry pi clusters (not cloud or vagrant). It's not random changes but correctives that fixes bugs found around and rising errors on raspberry Pi 4 s. I think ther's lot of tuning in os based tests and code syntax checks that I cannot commit in for. So I d like to pass this PR to each other and pin out about what improvements can be made to allow use of ARM and raspberry Pi systems in kubespray. I know about microk8s already, a good alternative too. Greetings De: notifications@github.comEnvoyé: 27 août 2020 19:17À: kubespray@noreply.github.comRépondre à: reply@reply.github.comCc: b23prodtm@users.sourceforge.net; mention@noreply.github.comObjet: Re: [kubernetes-sigs/kubespray] Kubespray for Raspberry Pi clusters (#5679)
I don't understand this pr, seems to be random changes all over the code base.
—You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.
|
@b23prodtm these are random changes all over the code base that does not respect reviewers! |
This PR is too big and modifies too many different things at once. Please open a PR per topic you're trying to address to reduce the scope. Closing that one |
@EppO: Closed this PR. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
What type of PR is this?
What this PR does / why we need it:
https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/kubespray/blob/master/docs/arch.md
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #4294
Special notes for your reviewer:
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?: