Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add Test Cases for slices package #1084

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
May 17, 2024

Conversation

joeyyy09
Copy link
Contributor

What type of PR is this?

/kind test

What this PR does / why we need it:

Adds comprehensive test cases for the slices package to ensure thorough coverage and functionality.

Special notes for your reviewer:

N/A

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?

No.

Additional documentation e.g., KEPs (Kubernetes Enhancement Proposals), usage docs, etc.:

NONE

Signed-off-by: Joeyyy09 <imt_2021063@iiitm.ac.in>
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@joeyyy09: The label(s) kind/test cannot be applied, because the repository doesn't have them.

In response to this:

What type of PR is this?

/kind test

What this PR does / why we need it:

Adds comprehensive test cases for the slices package to ensure thorough coverage and functionality.

Special notes for your reviewer:

N/A

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?

No.

Additional documentation e.g., KEPs (Kubernetes Enhancement Proposals), usage docs, etc.:

NONE

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed Indicates that a PR should not merge because it's missing one of the release note labels. label May 16, 2024
Copy link

linux-foundation-easycla bot commented May 16, 2024

CLA Signed

The committers listed above are authorized under a signed CLA.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the cncf-cla: no Indicates the PR's author has not signed the CNCF CLA. label May 16, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Welcome @joeyyy09!

It looks like this is your first PR to kubernetes-sigs/kwok 🎉. Please refer to our pull request process documentation to help your PR have a smooth ride to approval.

You will be prompted by a bot to use commands during the review process. Do not be afraid to follow the prompts! It is okay to experiment. Here is the bot commands documentation.

You can also check if kubernetes-sigs/kwok has its own contribution guidelines.

You may want to refer to our testing guide if you run into trouble with your tests not passing.

If you are having difficulty getting your pull request seen, please follow the recommended escalation practices. Also, for tips and tricks in the contribution process you may want to read the Kubernetes contributor cheat sheet. We want to make sure your contribution gets all the attention it needs!

Thank you, and welcome to Kubernetes. 😃

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @joeyyy09. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. labels May 16, 2024
Copy link

netlify bot commented May 16, 2024

Deploy Preview for k8s-kwok canceled.

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit d5984c8
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/k8s-kwok/deploys/6646eea591a33800080137ce

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. and removed cncf-cla: no Indicates the PR's author has not signed the CNCF CLA. labels May 16, 2024
Signed-off-by: Joeyyy09 <imt_2021063@iiitm.ac.in>
@joeyyy09
Copy link
Contributor Author

I updated the interface settings from args[S interface{ ~[]T }, T comparable] struct { to testCase[S ~[]T, T comparable] struct { for clarity and consistency. This change simplifies the interface definition while still ensuring that the types remain compatible with the requirements of the test cases. By using testCase instead of args, it more accurately reflects the purpose of the struct in the context of our test cases.

@joeyyy09
Copy link
Contributor Author

I modified the error handling logic to combine the error check with the condition for os.IsNotExist(err). This change simplifies the control flow by reducing nesting and makes the code easier to read. Now, if the error is not nil and not related to file not found (os.IsNotExist), we handle it accordingly. This refactor helped fix the linting issues i was facing

@wzshiming
Copy link
Member

/ok-to-test

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. and removed needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels May 17, 2024
@wzshiming
Copy link
Member

wzshiming commented May 17, 2024

I modified the error handling logic to combine the error check with the condition for os.IsNotExist(err). This change simplifies the control flow by reducing nesting and makes the code easier to read. Now, if the error is not nil and not related to file not found (os.IsNotExist), we handle it accordingly. This refactor helped fix the linting issues i was facing

It breaks the original logic, and I'm not sure the unit test covered this change.

Copy link
Member

@wzshiming wzshiming left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The test is look good, then revert content that is not in the title.

pkg/kwok/server/debugging_logs.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Signed-off-by: Joeyyy09 <imt_2021063@iiitm.ac.in>
@joeyyy09
Copy link
Contributor Author

The test is look good, then revert content that is not in the title.

Yeah, i've reverted back the changes

@wzshiming
Copy link
Member

/approve
/lgtm
/release-note-none
/label tide/merge-method-squash

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. tide/merge-method-squash Denotes a PR that should be squashed by tide when it merges. and removed do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed Indicates that a PR should not merge because it's missing one of the release note labels. labels May 17, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label May 17, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: joeyyy09, wzshiming

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label May 17, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 85fc8f6 into kubernetes-sigs:main May 17, 2024
26 checks passed
mohamedasifs123 pushed a commit to mohamedasifs123/kwok that referenced this pull request May 21, 2024
* Add Test Cases for slices package

Signed-off-by: Joeyyy09 <imt_2021063@iiitm.ac.in>

* Fix linting issues

Signed-off-by: Joeyyy09 <imt_2021063@iiitm.ac.in>

* Fix linting issues

Signed-off-by: Joeyyy09 <imt_2021063@iiitm.ac.in>

---------

Signed-off-by: Joeyyy09 <imt_2021063@iiitm.ac.in>

adding sets_test.go
joeyyy09 added a commit to joeyyy09/kwok that referenced this pull request May 29, 2024
* Add Test Cases for slices package

Signed-off-by: Joeyyy09 <imt_2021063@iiitm.ac.in>

* Fix linting issues

Signed-off-by: Joeyyy09 <imt_2021063@iiitm.ac.in>

* Fix linting issues

Signed-off-by: Joeyyy09 <imt_2021063@iiitm.ac.in>

---------

Signed-off-by: Joeyyy09 <imt_2021063@iiitm.ac.in>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. tide/merge-method-squash Denotes a PR that should be squashed by tide when it merges.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants