New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Release Helm chart v3.8.3 #1146
Release Helm chart v3.8.3 #1146
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Steve Hipwell <steve.hipwell@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: JUN YANG <yang.jun22@zte.com.cn>
Co-authored-by: JUN YANG <yang.jun22@zte.com.cn>
Signed-off-by: lvyanru <yanru.lv@daocloud.io>
Signed-off-by: lvyanru <yanru.lv@daocloud.io>
* also mention chart changes since the last release
e09607b
to
1d5b7df
Compare
/triage accepted |
/retest |
1 similar comment
/retest |
@stevehipwell , I think we need to check the helm chart. During the e2e test, there will be two deployments of metrics-server at the same time, such as Because the deployment under the default namespace has not been ready, the test failed |
@yangjunmyfm192085 how come there are two installations? |
I'm not sure. The guess may be that the helm chart specifies the namespace, and I am not sure which side of the value has an error |
2964b3a
to
02fd55d
Compare
@yangjunmyfm192085 it looks like you fixed |
/retest |
02fd55d
to
27922ee
Compare
@yangjunmyfm192085 do you know why there is already an installation of metrics-server in the Kind cluster as part of the e2e tests? |
@serathius the GH actions based Helm chart deployment is working correctly and the pull-metrics-server-test-e2e-helm check is working correctly on the I've opened #1147 to update the automation which I've been looking into ready for the next release and will finish it once this release is completed so I can make any changes which might be required. |
|
Signed-off-by: Steve Hipwell <steve.hipwell@gmail.com>
27922ee
to
e80450b
Compare
/retest |
1 similar comment
/retest |
@yangjunmyfm192085 @serathius could you please review this now as the tests are passing correctly. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It seems ok to me. I think we need @serathius 's final review
/lgtm
@serathius @dgrisonnet could one of you take a look at this? |
/lgtm |
@dgrisonnet do we need to wait for @serathius to approve or could you approve? |
I am not an approver so I can't approve. That said I have the permissions to merge but I'd rather not use them and follow the usual workflow. Let's wait a bit for Marek to have a look |
/approve |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: serathius, stevehipwell The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
What this PR does / why we need it:
This PR releases the
v3.8.3
Helm chart containing Metrics Server v0.6.2. I've had to leave the default container port and registry changes out of this release so they will be in the chart forv0.7.0
when that is released.Which issue(s) this PR fixes (optional, in
fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)
format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged):Fixes #1085
Fixes #1125
Fixes #1135