-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 175
Multi-Tenancy Benchmarks (MTB) Project #551
Comments
/assign @JimBugwadia |
@JimBugwadia I would like to work this summer on this project. May I know how to start it?Can you assign me an issue? |
@JimBugwadia I have applied on community bridge and messaged you on slack for more information. You can check my portfolio here at https://dhiraj240.github.io/ |
Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity. If this issue is safe to close now please do so with Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta. |
Stale issues rot after 30d of inactivity. If this issue is safe to close now please do so with Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta. |
/close |
@JimBugwadia: Closing this issue. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
This issue provides a description of the proposed GSoC Multi-Tenancy Benchmark Project.
The Kubernetes Multi-Tenancy Working Group is chartered with exploring and defining multi-tenancy models for Kubernetes. An overview of working group activities can be found in this Kubernetes Multi-Tenancy Working Group .
The Multi-Tenancy Benchmarks effort focuses on measuring and validating the desired behaviors for multi tenancy. Part of this effort is to automate behavioral and configuration checks on existing clusters, which will be the focus of this project. This automated test suit will help all Kubernetes users validate whether their clusters are setup correctly for multi-tenancy.
The goals of the project will be to:
Also see:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: