-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 175
[MTB]Added Remaining benchmarks #880
[MTB]Added Remaining benchmarks #880
Conversation
Hi @Divya063. Thanks for your PR. I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the I understand the commands that are listed here. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/assign @JimBugwadia |
benchmarks/kubectl-mtb/test/benchmarks/configure_ns_quotas/configure_ns_quotas.go
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
"sigs.k8s.io/multi-tenancy/benchmarks/kubectl-mtb/test/utils" | ||
) | ||
|
||
func getResourceNameList(tclient *kubernetes.Clientset) ([]string, error) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@Divya063 Using nodes for retrieving resource list is not a good idea here because it contains more resources that we dont have to check like hugepages. We can go with pre-set resource list and giving user feature to add their own resources.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@JimBugwadia Would it be okay if we ask the user to pass their own resource list via CLI or a YAML file?
58c9d85
to
3edbf38
Compare
3edbf38
to
b75391d
Compare
/ok-to-test |
/lgtm |
/lgtm |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: Divya063, JimBugwadia The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
No description provided.