Fix serviceaccount handling for nfd-gc to be consistent with others

[shivamerla]

No description provided.

[linux-foundation-easycla]

The committers listed above are authorized under a signed CLA.

• ✅ login: shivamerla / name: Shiva Krishna Merla (6237b82)

[netlify]

✅ Deploy Preview for kubernetes-sigs-nfd ready!

Name	Link
🔨 Latest commit	6237b82
🔍 Latest deploy log	https://app.netlify.com/sites/kubernetes-sigs-nfd/deploys/651de513d6ce620008be30a7
😎 Deploy Preview	https://deploy-preview-1392--kubernetes-sigs-nfd.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile	Toggle QR Code... Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

---

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

[k8s-ci-robot]

Welcome @shivamerla!

It looks like this is your first PR to kubernetes-sigs/node-feature-discovery 🎉. Please refer to our pull request process documentation to help your PR have a smooth ride to approval.

You will be prompted by a bot to use commands during the review process. Do not be afraid to follow the prompts! It is okay to experiment. Here is the bot commands documentation.

You can also check if kubernetes-sigs/node-feature-discovery has its own contribution guidelines.

You may want to refer to our testing guide if you run into trouble with your tests not passing.

If you are having difficulty getting your pull request seen, please follow the recommended escalation practices. Also, for tips and tricks in the contribution process you may want to read the Kubernetes contributor cheat sheet. We want to make sure your contribution gets all the attention it needs!

Thank you, and welcome to Kubernetes. 😃

[k8s-ci-robot]

Hi @shivamerla. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[marquiz]

Thanks @shivamerla for the fix. Looks good!

Could you sign the CLA so that we can get this merged?

/lgtm
/cherry-pick release-0.14

[k8s-ci-robot]

LGTM label has been added.

Git tree hash: 84eae1b922f0842016279b994ced422bd8a8efac

[k8s-ci-robot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: marquiz, shivamerla

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS [marquiz]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[marquiz]

Could you sign the CLA so that we can get this merged?

Sorry @shivamerla I was looking some unfreshed page of this 🙈 CLA is fine

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #1392 (6237b82) into master (dd8d7f6) will increase coverage by 0.11%.
Report is 2 commits behind head on master.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #1392      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   30.02%   30.14%   +0.11%     
==========================================
  Files          56       56              
  Lines        7457     7497      +40     
==========================================
+ Hits         2239     2260      +21     
- Misses       4974     4991      +17     
- Partials      244      246       +2     

see 1 file with indirect coverage changes

[ArangoGutierrez]

/cherry-pick release-0.14

[k8s-infra-cherrypick-robot]

@ArangoGutierrez: failed to push cherry-picked changes in GitHub: pushToNamedFork is not implemented in the v2 client

In response to this:

/cherry-pick release-0.14

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.