Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

test: add tests for multiple secret provider class #261

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 6, 2020

Conversation

aramase
Copy link
Member

@aramase aramase commented Jul 29, 2020

What this PR does / why we need it:
With the introduction of new reconciler for creating k8s secrets, multiple SecretProviderClass for secret objects is handled. Adding e2e tests as part of this PR to CI.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes (optional, using fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...) format, will close the issue(s) when the PR gets merged):
Fixes #187

Special notes for your reviewer:

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. label Jul 29, 2020
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: aramase

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Jul 29, 2020
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot requested a review from ritazh July 29, 2020 00:22
@aramase aramase added this to the v0.0.13 milestone Jul 29, 2020
@aramase
Copy link
Member Author

aramase commented Jul 29, 2020

/retitle [WIP] test: add tests for multiple secret provider class

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot changed the title test: add tests for multiple secret provider class [WIP] test: add tests for multiple secret provider class Jul 29, 2020
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Jul 29, 2020
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Aug 2, 2020
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Aug 4, 2020
@aramase aramase changed the title [WIP] test: add tests for multiple secret provider class test: add tests for multiple secret provider class Aug 4, 2020
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Aug 4, 2020
@aramase aramase force-pushed the multiple-spc branch 3 times, most recently from 46e9686 to 9ea6439 Compare August 5, 2020 07:56
@ritazh
Copy link
Member

ritazh commented Aug 6, 2020

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. labels Aug 6, 2020
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. labels Aug 6, 2020
@aramase
Copy link
Member Author

aramase commented Aug 6, 2020

New changes are detected. LGTM label has been removed.

Rebased the PR

@ritazh
Copy link
Member

ritazh commented Aug 6, 2020

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Aug 6, 2020
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 721a1e9 into kubernetes-sigs:master Aug 6, 2020
@aramase aramase deleted the multiple-spc branch August 6, 2020 06:01
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Better handler for multiple secretsproviderclass volumes
3 participants