-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 99
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Expand the scope of the operator to AppArmor #118
Comments
cc @mrostecki |
@saschagrunert @pjbgf what are y'all thinking about potential rename? Would likely be good to do sooner rather than later if it is something we want to do. |
Yes I think that's a good idea. Do you wanna go ahead and create the issue? 👍 |
Yep, completely agree we rather do that soon. Will create a few issues on this now. |
Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity. If this issue is safe to close now please do so with Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta. |
/remove-lifecycle stale. |
Stale issues rot after 30d of inactivity. If this issue is safe to close now please do so with Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta. |
/remove-lifecycle rotten |
Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity. If this issue is safe to close now please do so with Send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community. |
/remove-lifecycle stale |
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs. This bot triages issues and PRs according to the following rules:
You can:
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community. /lifecycle stale |
/remove-lifecycle stale |
Initial support done via #680 |
Loading AppArmor profiles could be done easily by the operator, too. We probably have to rename the project to something like "security-operator", too.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: