-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 100
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add log enricher documentation #498
Add log enricher documentation #498
Conversation
This patch adds log enricher documentation to the installation and usage guide. It also reformats the headers to align with the new content. Signed-off-by: Sascha Grunert <sgrunert@redhat.com>
a479618
to
b8ea519
Compare
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #498 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 38.25% 38.25%
=======================================
Files 23 23
Lines 1200 1200
=======================================
Hits 459 459
Misses 726 726
Partials 15 15 |
/test pull-security-profiles-operator-test-e2e |
@saschagrunert: The following test failed, say
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Please help us cut down on flakes by linking to an open issue when you hit one in your PR. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
the documentation reads well to me.
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: jhrozek, saschagrunert The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
btw feel free to merge despite the test failing, there's no reason a patch for readme should be blocked by a test :-) (unless you want to debug the test...) |
What type of PR is this?
/kind documentation
What this PR does / why we need it:
This patch adds log enricher documentation to the installation and usage
guide. It also reformats the headers to align with the new content.
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
None
Does this PR have test?
None
Special notes for your reviewer:
None
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?