Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add profiling endpoint support #746

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 4, 2021

Conversation

saschagrunert
Copy link
Member

What type of PR is this?

/kind feature

What this PR does / why we need it:

Adding profiling endpoint support.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Does this PR have test?

None

Special notes for your reviewer:

None

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?

Adding profiling endpoint support via the SPOD configuration `enableProfiling`

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. labels Dec 2, 2021
@saschagrunert saschagrunert force-pushed the profiling branch 8 times, most recently from 0481c1a to 55a4162 Compare December 2, 2021 15:45
Signed-off-by: Sascha Grunert <sgrunert@redhat.com>
@saschagrunert saschagrunert changed the title WIP: Add profiling endpoint support Add profiling endpoint support Dec 2, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Dec 2, 2021
Copy link
Contributor

@jhrozek jhrozek left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Dec 2, 2021
@saschagrunert
Copy link
Member Author

/test pull-security-profiles-operator-test-e2e

Copy link
Contributor

@JAORMX JAORMX left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: JAORMX, jhrozek, saschagrunert

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
  • OWNERS [JAORMX,jhrozek,saschagrunert]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 71b3915 into kubernetes-sigs:main Dec 4, 2021
@saschagrunert saschagrunert deleted the profiling branch December 6, 2021 08:08
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants