Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Deletion of PVCs on statefulsetscale-up due to low intervals #405

Open
JacobAmar opened this issue Aug 24, 2023 · 8 comments
Open

Deletion of PVCs on statefulsetscale-up due to low intervals #405

JacobAmar opened this issue Aug 24, 2023 · 8 comments
Labels
lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale.

Comments

@JacobAmar
Copy link

JacobAmar commented Aug 24, 2023

Issue with node-cleanup-controller

Automatic deletion of PVC (PersistentVolumeClaim) /PV (PersistentVolume) on scale-up of statefulset pods.
Each time a statefulset pod is evicted, a PVC is required to be deleted by setting a low discovery interval and deletion delay time. However, the issue arises when the system is scaled up. During a statefulset pod scale-up, the PVC/PV are first created and due to the short discovery interval and deletion delay time, they are automatically deleted.

Expected Behavior:

When a statefulset pod scaling-up operation occurs, there should be no deletion of PVC/PV.

Steps to Reproduce:

To reproduce the issue, please follow the steps below:

Set a discovery interval to 5 seconds and deletion delay to 1 second.
Deploy a statefulset with PVC.
Attempt to scale it up.
After the scale-up, you will notice that the newly created PVC/PV are deleted automatically due to low interval times.
Anything else we need to know?:

Environment:

  • CSI Driver version: we are using a local nvme disk on ec2
  • Kubernetes version (use kubectl version): 1.23
  • OS (e.g. from /etc/os-release): "Amazon Linux 2"
  • Kernel (e.g. uname -a): 5.10.186-179.751.amzn2.x86_64
@JacobAmar
Copy link
Author

Update:
it seems like a bug in version 2.6.0, the real problem is that the controller tried to delete a pv from active node

@mauriciopoppe
Copy link
Member

/cc @msau42

@msau42
Copy link
Contributor

msau42 commented Aug 24, 2023

The deletion logic should only be triggered when the Node doesn't exist. Can you clarify in the scale up case, when does the Node object get created?

It is possible that there could also be a race condition where the controller does not see a new Node yet when it's processing a PV.

@msau42
Copy link
Contributor

msau42 commented Sep 12, 2023

One thing that may help is to make sure we only process PVCs that are Bound.

cc @mattcary

@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues.

This bot triages un-triaged issues according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the issue is closed

You can:

  • Mark this issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale
  • Close this issue with /close
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Jan 28, 2024
@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues.

This bot triages un-triaged issues according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the issue is closed

You can:

  • Mark this issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten
  • Close this issue with /close
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/lifecycle rotten

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. and removed lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. labels Feb 27, 2024
@msau42
Copy link
Contributor

msau42 commented Mar 9, 2024

/remove-lifecycle rotten

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. label Mar 9, 2024
@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues.

This bot triages un-triaged issues according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the issue is closed

You can:

  • Mark this issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale
  • Close this issue with /close
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Jun 7, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants